Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro M5100 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro M5100

2013Core: 725 MHzBoost: 775 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 2100

2017Core: 925 MHzBoost: 1219 MHz
Buy on Amazon

FirePro M5100 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 Performance Spectrum

FirePro M5100
2 GB 150
1,874
+0.2%
brand logoRadeon HD 6750
brand logoRadeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
brand logoRadeon R7 M370
brand logoRadeon RX Vega 9
brand logoRadeon RX 6300M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7700S
brand logoRadeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
Radeon Pro WX 2100
2 GB 35
1,871
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 6750
brand logoRadeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
brand logoRadeon R7 M370
brand logoRadeon RX Vega 9
brand logoRadeon RX 6300M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7700S
brand logoRadeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M5100 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M5100

2013

Why buy it

  • ✅Measures 82mm instead of 168mm, a 86mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ❌328.6% higher power demand at 150W vs 35W.

Radeon Pro WX 2100

2017

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 35W instead of 150W, a 115W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌104.9% longer card at 168mm vs 82mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro M5100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (1,874 vs 1,871), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro M5100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro WX 2100 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro WX 2100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro M5100 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro M5100 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro M5100

The FirePro M5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,874 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 2100

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,871 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M5100 scores 1,874 and the Radeon Pro WX 2100 reaches 1,871 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M5100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M5100) vs 512 (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Raw compute: 0.992 TFLOPS (FirePro M5100) vs 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Boost clocks: 775 MHz vs 1219 MHz.

FeatureFirePro M5100Radeon Pro WX 2100
G3D Mark Score
1,874
1,871
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
640+25%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.992 TFLOPS
1.248 TFLOPS+26%
Boost Clock
775 MHz
1219 MHz+57%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40+25%
32
L1 Cache
160 KB+25%
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro M5100Radeon Pro WX 2100
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M5100 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 2100.

FeatureFirePro M5100Radeon Pro WX 2100
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL11_1) (FirePro M5100) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro M5100Radeon Pro WX 2100
DirectX
12 (FL11_1)
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
1
3+200%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M5100) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1 (FirePro M5100) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 2100).

FeatureFirePro M5100Radeon Pro WX 2100
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
Decoder
UVD 4.0
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,VC-1
H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M5100 draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro WX 2100's 35W — a 124.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M5100) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 82mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureFirePro M5100Radeon Pro WX 2100
TDP
150W
35W-77%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
82mm
168mm
Height
70mm
69mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
12.5
53.5+328%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M5100 came in at $0, while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 launched at $149. On MSRP, FirePro M5100 was 100+% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro M5100) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) — the FirePro M5100 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 2100 (2017 vs 2013).

FeatureFirePro M5100Radeon Pro WX 2100
MSRP
$0-100%
$149
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
12.6
Codename
Venus
Lexa
Release
October 16 2013
June 4 2017
Ranking
#701
#702
Search FirePro M5100 on AmazonSearch Radeon Pro WX 2100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.