
FirePro M5100 vs GeForce GTX 570M

FirePro M5100
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 570M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 570M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 570M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro M5100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro M5100 | GeForce GTX 570M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 570M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M5100 and GeForce GTX 570M

FirePro M5100
The FirePro M5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,874 points.

GeForce GTX 570M
The GeForce GTX 570M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M5100 scores 1,874 and the GeForce GTX 570M reaches 1,880 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M5100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 570M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M5100) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 570M). Raw compute: 0.992 TFLOPS (FirePro M5100) vs 0.7728 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 570M).
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | GeForce GTX 570M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,874 | 1,880 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+90% | 336 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.992 TFLOPS+28% | 0.7728 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 24+50% |
| TMUs | 40 | 56+40% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 448 KB+180% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | GeForce GTX 570M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M5100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 570M has 2 GB. The FirePro M5100 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M5100) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 570M) — the GeForce GTX 570M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | GeForce GTX 570M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+33% | 1.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL11_1) (FirePro M5100) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 570M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | GeForce GTX 570M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M5100) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 570M). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1 (FirePro M5100) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 570M).
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | GeForce GTX 570M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M5100 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 570M's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 570M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M5100) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 570M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | GeForce GTX 570M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 75W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 82mm | — |
| Height | 70mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-17% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 12.5 | 25.1+101% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M5100 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | GeForce GTX 570M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | — |
| Codename | Venus | GF114 |
| Release | October 16 2013 | June 28 2011 |
| Ranking | #701 | #699 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















