GeForce 945A vs Iris Plus Graphics

NVIDIA

GeForce 945A

2015Core: 1006 MHzBoost: 1189 MHz
VS
Intel

Iris Plus Graphics

Boost: 1000 MHz

GeForce 945A vs Iris Plus Graphics Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 945A vs Iris Plus Graphics: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 945A

2015

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Plus Graphics is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 945A is the less risky modern option long term.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 120% higher power demand at 33W vs 15W.

Iris Plus Graphics

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 33W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 945A is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.5% in PassMark G3D (1,852 vs 1,789), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 945A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM and a newer 2015 generation instead of 0. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 945A makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $100 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3.5% (18.5 vs 17.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 945A vs Iris Plus Graphics Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 945A

The GeForce 945A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1189 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,852 points.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics

The Iris Plus Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 945A scores 1,852 and the Iris Plus Graphics reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 945A is built on Maxwell while the Iris Plus Graphics uses Generation 11.0, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 945A) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics). Raw compute: 0.9132 TFLOPS (GeForce 945A) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics). Boost clocks: 1189 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 945AIris Plus Graphics
G3D Mark Score
1,852+4%
1,789
Architecture
Maxwell
Generation 11.0
Process Node
28 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9132 TFLOPS
1.024 TFLOPS+12%
Boost Clock
1189 MHz+19%
1000 MHz
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
24
32+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 945A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Plus Graphics leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 945AIris Plus Graphics
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 945A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics carries 0 MB. GeForce 945A gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 945A and System on the Iris Plus Graphics.

FeatureGeForce 945AIris Plus Graphics
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 945A) vs 12_1 (Iris Plus Graphics). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce 945AIris Plus Graphics
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12_1
Max Displays
2
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce 945A) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs QuickSync.

FeatureGeForce 945AIris Plus Graphics
Encoder
4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell)
QuickSync
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
QuickSync
Codecs
H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 945A draws 33W versus the Iris Plus Graphics's 15W — a 75% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 945A) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics). Power connectors: Legacy vs Integrated.

FeatureGeForce 945AIris Plus Graphics
TDP
33W
15W-55%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
Legacy
Integrated
Length
1mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
56.1
119.3+113%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 945A came in at $100, while the Iris Plus Graphics launched at $100. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.5 (GeForce 945A) vs 17.9 (Iris Plus Graphics) — the GeForce 945A offers 3.4% better value.

FeatureGeForce 945AIris Plus Graphics
MSRP
$100
$100
Performance per Dollar
18.5+3%
17.9
Codename
GM108
Ice Lake GT2
Release
March 13 2015
sem dados
Ranking
#705
#714

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.