
GeForce 945A
Popular choices:

Iris Plus Graphics 950
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce 945A
2015Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- β Less risky long-term buy than Iris Plus Graphics 950: it remains the more sensible modern option while Iris Plus Graphics 950 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β120% higher power demand at 33W vs 15W.
Iris Plus Graphics 950
Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 33W, a 18W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: older-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
GeForce 945A
2015Iris Plus Graphics 950
Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- β Less risky long-term buy than Iris Plus Graphics 950: it remains the more sensible modern option while Iris Plus Graphics 950 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 33W, a 18W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β120% higher power demand at 33W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: older-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce 945A better than Iris Plus Graphics 950?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Iris Plus Graphics 950 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce 945A | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 32 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 7 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 20 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 12 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 8 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce 945A | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 20 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 12 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce 945A | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 20 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce 945A | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 20 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 945A and Iris Plus Graphics 950

GeForce 945A
GeForce 945A
The GeForce 945A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1189 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,852 points.

Iris Plus Graphics 950
Iris Plus Graphics 950
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 945A scores 1,852 and the Iris Plus Graphics 950 reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 945A is built on Maxwell while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 uses Generation 11.0, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 945A) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Raw compute: 0.9132 TFLOPS (GeForce 945A) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Boost clocks: 1189 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 945A | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,852+4% | 1,789 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 11.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9132 TFLOPS | 1.024 TFLOPS+12% |
| Boost Clock | 1189 MHz+19% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 945A gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce 945A | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 945A comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 has 0 MB. The GeForce 945A offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce 945A | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 945A) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce 945A | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce 945A) vs Quick Sync 7 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs Quick Sync 7. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (GeForce 945A) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 (Iris Plus Graphics 950).
| Feature | GeForce 945A | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) | Quick Sync 7 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | Quick Sync 7 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 945A draws 33W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 950's 15W β a 75% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 945A) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Power connectors: Legacy vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 80Β°C vs 85Β°C.
| Feature | GeForce 945A | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 15W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Integrated |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80Β°C-6% | 85Β°C |
| Perf/Watt | 56.1 | 119.3+113% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 945A launched at $100 MSRP, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 launched at $0. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 costs 100+% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.5 (GeForce 945A) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 950) β the Iris Plus Graphics 950 offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | GeForce 945A | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.5 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM108 | Ice Lake GT2 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #705 | #634 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













