
GeForce 945M vs Radeon R9 M385

GeForce 945M
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M385
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 945M is positioned at rank 100 and the Radeon R9 M385 is on rank 420, so the GeForce 945M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 945M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M385
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 945M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M385 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 945M | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 M385 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 M385 holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $98), it costs 39% less, resulting in a 59.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 945M | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+59.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($98) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 945M and Radeon R9 M385

GeForce 945M
The GeForce 945M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,109 points.

Radeon R9 M385
The Radeon R9 M385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,061 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 945M scores 2,109 and the Radeon R9 M385 reaches 2,061 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 945M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R9 M385 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 945M) vs 896 (Radeon R9 M385). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 945M) vs 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M385). Boost clocks: 1020 MHz vs 1100 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 945M | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,109+2% | 2,061 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 896+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.306 TFLOPS | 1.792 TFLOPS+37% |
| Boost Clock | 1020 MHz | 1100 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 56+40% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+43% | 224 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 945M | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 945M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M385 has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M385 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 80 GB/s (GeForce 945M) vs 96 GB/s (Radeon R9 M385) — a 20% advantage for the Radeon R9 M385. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 945M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M385) — the GeForce 945M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 945M | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 96 GB/s+20% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 945M draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 M385's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 M385 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 945M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M385). Power connectors: Legacy vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce 945M | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 28.1+2% | 27.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M385 costs 38.8% less ($38 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.5 (GeForce 945M) vs 34.4 (Radeon R9 M385) — the Radeon R9 M385 offers 60% better value.
| Feature | GeForce 945M | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $98 | $60-39% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.5 | 34.4+60% |
| Codename | GM107 | Strato |
| Release | October 27 2015 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #671 | #674 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















