GeForce 9500 GS vs GeForce GT 220
GeForce 9500 GS
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 220
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9500 GS is positioned at rank 644 and the GeForce GT 220 is on rank 287, so the GeForce GT 220 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9500 GS
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 220
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 220 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9500 GS.
| Insight | GeForce 9500 GS | GeForce GT 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9500 GS offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9500 GS holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $49), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 376.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9500 GS | GeForce GT 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+376.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9500 GS and GeForce GT 220
GeForce 9500 GS
The GeForce 9500 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 216 points.
GeForce GT 220
The GeForce GT 220 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 236W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 222 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9500 GS scores 216 and the GeForce GT 220 reaches 222 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9500 GS is built on G9x while the GeForce GT 220 uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 65 nm process. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9500 GS) vs 240 (GeForce GT 220).
| Feature | GeForce 9500 GS | GeForce GT 220 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 216 | 222+3% |
| Architecture | G9x | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 240+7% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9500 GS | GeForce GT 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9500 GS comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 220 has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 220 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 9500 GS | GeForce GT 220 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9500 GS) vs 10.1 (GeForce GT 220). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce 9500 GS | GeForce GT 220 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0)+10% | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (GeForce 9500 GS) vs No (GeForce GT 220). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 9500 GS) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 220).
| Feature | GeForce 9500 GS | GeForce GT 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9500 GS draws 150W versus the GeForce GT 220's 236W — a 44.6% difference. The GeForce 9500 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9500 GS) vs 350W (GeForce GT 220). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce 9500 GS | GeForce GT 220 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-36% | 236W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 65°C-19% |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4+56% | 0.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9500 GS launched at $110 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce GT 220 launched at $69 and now averages $49. The GeForce 9500 GS costs 79.6% less ($39 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.6 (GeForce 9500 GS) vs 4.5 (GeForce GT 220) — the GeForce 9500 GS offers 380% better value.
| Feature | GeForce 9500 GS | GeForce GT 220 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $110 | $69-37% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-80% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.6+380% | 4.5 |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | GT200 |
| Release | July 15 2008 | June 16 2008 |
| Ranking | #825 | #802 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9500 GS and GeForce GT 220
