
GeForce 9500 GS

GeForce GT 220
GeForce 9500 GS vs GeForce GT 220 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9500 GS vs GeForce GT 220 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 9500 GS vs GeForce GT 220: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9500 GS
2008Why buy it
- ✅0.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 236W, a 86W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌59.4% HIGHER MSRP$110 MSRPvs$69 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($110 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
GeForce GT 220
2008Why buy it
- ✅Costs $41 less on MSRP ($69 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 63.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($69 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 9500 GS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌57.3% higher power demand at 236W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9500 GS vs GeForce GT 220 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9500 GS
The GeForce 9500 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 216 points.

GeForce GT 220
The GeForce GT 220 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 236W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 222 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9500 GS scores 216 and the GeForce GT 220 reaches 222 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9500 GS is built on G9x while the GeForce GT 220 uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 65 nm process. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9500 GS) vs 240 (GeForce GT 220).
| Feature | GeForce 9500 GS | GeForce GT 220 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 216 | 222+3% |
| Architecture | G9x | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 240+7% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9500 GS | GeForce GT 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9500 GS has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 220 carries 1 GB. GeForce GT 220 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 9500 GS and 64-bit on the GeForce GT 220.
| Feature | GeForce 9500 GS | GeForce GT 220 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9500 GS) vs 10.1 (GeForce GT 220). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce 9500 GS | GeForce GT 220 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0)+10% | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (GeForce 9500 GS) vs No (GeForce GT 220). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 9500 GS) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 220).
| Feature | GeForce 9500 GS | GeForce GT 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9500 GS draws 150W versus the GeForce GT 220's 236W — a 44.6% difference. The GeForce 9500 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9500 GS) vs 350W (GeForce GT 220). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce 9500 GS | GeForce GT 220 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-36% | 236W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 65°C-19% |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4+56% | 0.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 9500 GS came in at $110, while the GeForce GT 220 launched at $69. On MSRP, GeForce GT 220 was 37.3% cheaper ($41 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (GeForce 9500 GS) vs 3.2 (GeForce GT 220) — the GeForce GT 220 offers 60% better value.
| Feature | GeForce 9500 GS | GeForce GT 220 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $110 | $69-37% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 3.2+60% |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | GT200 |
| Release | July 15 2008 | June 16 2008 |
| Ranking | #825 | #802 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














