GeForce 9500M GS vs GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

GeForce 9500M GS

2008Core: 500 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······

GeForce 9500M GS vs GeForce GTX 1650 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9500M GS vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9500M GS vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9500M GS

2008

Why buy it

  • Costs $89 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.2 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • 2237.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 2282.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • GeForce 9500M GS is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2237.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 5816.5% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 133), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 65nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $89 more expensive on MSRP at $149 vs $60, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2282.5% (52.8 vs 2.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 9500M GS vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9500M GS

The GeForce 9500M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 133 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 9500M GS scores 133 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 5816.5%. The GeForce 9500M GS is built on G9x while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 65 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9500M GS) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureGeForce 9500M GSGeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
133
7,869+5817%
Architecture
G9x
Turing
Process Node
65 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
224
896+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 9500M GSGeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9500M GS has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 9500M GS and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650.

FeatureGeForce 9500M GSGeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
128 GB/s
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9500M GS) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: None vs 1.4. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce 9500M GSGeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
10.0
12+20%
Vulkan
None
1.4
OpenGL
3.3
4.6+39%
Max Displays
1
3+200%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9500M GS) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 9500M GS) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureGeForce 9500M GSGeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
No
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9500M GS draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9500M GS) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce 9500M GSGeForce GTX 1650
TDP
150W
75W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
Legacy
None
Length
0mm
229mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
70°C-7%
Perf/Watt
0.9
104.9+11556%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9500M GS came in at $60, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce 9500M GS was 59.7% cheaper ($89 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.2 (GeForce 9500M GS) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 2300% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 9500M GSGeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$60-60%
$149
Performance per Dollar
2.2
52.8+2300%
Codename
NB9E-GTX
TU117
Release
July 15 2008
April 23 2019
Ranking
#825
#323

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.