GeForce 9500M GS
VS
Mobility Radeon HD 4330

GeForce 9500M GS vs Mobility Radeon HD 4330

NVIDIA

GeForce 9500M GS

2008Core: 500 MHz
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4330

2009Core: 550 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9500M GS is positioned at rank 628 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4330 is on rank 599, so the Mobility Radeon HD 4330 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9500M GS

#618
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
4891%
#620
4433%
#621
4422%
#625
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
4021%
#626
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
3993%
#628
GeForce 9500M GS
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
100%
#629
GeForce 8800 GS
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
99%
#631
GeForce 9800 GTX+
MSRP: $229|Avg: $50
96%
#632
Mobility Radeon X1700
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
96%
#633
Mobility Radeon HD 560v
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
95%
#634
GeForce 9300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
95%
#635
Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
MSRP: $899|Avg: $400
95%
#636
GeForce 8400M G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
95%
#637
GeForce 8400M GS
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
94%
#638
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
94%
#639
GeForce 9100
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
92%
#640
GeForce 8300
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
92%
#641
GeForce 9600M GT
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
92%
#642
Mobility Radeon HD 3430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
90%
#643
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 4330

#587
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
3934%
#589
3566%
#590
3557%
#594
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
3234%
#595
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
3212%
#597
GeForce 210
MSRP: $50|Avg: $5
100%
#598
Mobility Radeon X1900
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
100%
#599
Mobility Radeon HD 4330
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
100%
#600
Radeon R7 M365X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#601
Mobility Radeon HD 5870
MSRP: $399|Avg: $50
99%
#602
Radeon R7 M260DX
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#603
Radeon HD 8610G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#604
95%
#605
Radeon HD 4650 AGP
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
94%
#606
GeForce 9800M GS
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
94%
#607
Radeon R7 M270
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
93%
#608
GeForce 9800 GTX
MSRP: $299|Avg: $30
93%
#609
Mobility Radeon HD 5850
MSRP: $299|Avg: $30
92%
#610
92%
#612
GeForce 205
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Mobility Radeon HD 4330 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9500M GS.

InsightGeForce 9500M GSMobility Radeon HD 4330
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)
Leading raw performance (+1.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 9500M GS offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9500M GS holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $49), it costs 69% less, resulting in a 221.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce 9500M GSMobility Radeon HD 4330
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+221.8%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9500M GS and Mobility Radeon HD 4330

NVIDIA

GeForce 9500M GS

The GeForce 9500M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 133 points.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4330

The Mobility Radeon HD 4330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 135 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9500M GS scores 133 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4330 reaches 135 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9500M GS is built on G9x while the Mobility Radeon HD 4330 uses TeraScale, both on 65 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9500M GS) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4330).

FeatureGeForce 9500M GSMobility Radeon HD 4330
G3D Mark Score
133
135+2%
Architecture
G9x
TeraScale
Process Node
65 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
224
800+257%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 9500M GSMobility Radeon HD 4330
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce 9500M GSMobility Radeon HD 4330
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9500M GS) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4330). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 9500M GSMobility Radeon HD 4330
DirectX
10.0
10.1
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9500M GS) vs UVD2 (Mobility Radeon HD 4330). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 9500M GS) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Mobility Radeon HD 4330).

FeatureGeForce 9500M GSMobility Radeon HD 4330
Encoder
No
UVD2
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
UVD2
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9500M GS draws 150W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4330's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9500M GS) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4330). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce 9500M GSMobility Radeon HD 4330
TDP
150W
30W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
0.9
4.5+400%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 9500M GS launched at $60 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4330 launched at $49 and now averages $49. The GeForce 9500M GS costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.9 (GeForce 9500M GS) vs 2.8 (Mobility Radeon HD 4330) — the GeForce 9500M GS offers 217.9% better value. The Mobility Radeon HD 4330 is the newer GPU (2009 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 9500M GSMobility Radeon HD 4330
MSRP
$60
$49-18%
Avg Price (30d)
$15-69%
$49
Performance per Dollar
8.9+218%
2.8
Codename
NB9E-GTX
M98
Release
July 15 2008
January 9 2009
Ranking
#825
#927