GeForce 9600 GS vs Radeon HD 2900 GT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9600 GS vs Radeon HD 2900 GT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 9600 GS vs Radeon HD 2900 GT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9600 GS
2008Why buy it
- β 23.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (768 MB vs 512 MB).
- β Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- β2008 hardware with 768 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
- β500% higher power demand at 150W vs 25W.
Radeon HD 2900 GT
2013Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Draws 25W instead of 150W, a 125W reduction.
- β More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009β2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than GeForce 9600 GS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- βLess VRAM, with 512 MB vs 768 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9600 GS vs Radeon HD 2900 GT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9600 GS
The GeForce 9600 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 282 points.

Radeon HD 2900 GT
The Radeon HD 2900 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 292 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9600 GS scores 282 and the Radeon HD 2900 GT reaches 292 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9600 GS is built on G9x while the Radeon HD 2900 GT uses TeraScale 2, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9600 GS) vs 480 (Radeon HD 2900 GT).
| Feature | GeForce 9600 GS | Radeon HD 2900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 282 | 292+4% |
| Architecture | G9x | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 480+114% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 9600 GS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 2900 GT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 9600 GS | Radeon HD 2900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9600 GS has 768 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 2900 GT carries 512 MB. GeForce 9600 GS gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 9600 GS and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 2900 GT.
| Feature | GeForce 9600 GS | Radeon HD 2900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.75 GB+50% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9600 GS) vs 10 (Radeon HD 2900 GT). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9600 GS | Radeon HD 2900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0)+11% | 10 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 9600 GS) vs UVD (Radeon HD 2900 GT). Decoder: VP2 vs UVD.
| Feature | GeForce 9600 GS | Radeon HD 2900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | UVD |
| Decoder | VP2 | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | β |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9600 GS draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 2900 GT's 25W β a 142.9% difference. The Radeon HD 2900 GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9600 GS) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2900 GT). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 9600 GS | Radeon HD 2900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 25W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | β |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 1.9 | 11.7+516% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 9600 GS came in at $0, while the Radeon HD 2900 GT launched at $170. On MSRP, GeForce 9600 GS was 100+% cheaper ($170 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce 9600 GS) vs 1.7 (Radeon HD 2900 GT) β the GeForce 9600 GS offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 2900 GT (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 9600 GS | Radeon HD 2900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $170 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 1.7 |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | Thames |
| Release | July 15 2008 | January 7 2013 |
| Ranking | #825 | #883 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















