GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ vs Radeon R5 A240

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ vs Radeon R5 A240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ vs Radeon R5 A240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+

2008

Why buy it

✅78.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
129% HIGHER MSRP
$229 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.

Radeon R5 A240

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $129 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
✅Delivers 131% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.8 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 78.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 A240 instead at 576 vs 571, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 A240 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $129 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $229, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 131% (5.8 vs 2.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 A240 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ vs Radeon R5 A240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+

The GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 571 points.

Radeon R5 A240

The Radeon R5 A240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 576 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ scores 571 and the Radeon R5 A240 reaches 576 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ is built on G9x while the Radeon R5 A240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+) vs 320 (Radeon R5 A240).

Feature	GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+	Radeon R5 A240
G3D Mark Score	571	576
Architecture	G9x	GCN 1.0
Process Node	65 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	224	320+43%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 A240 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+	Radeon R5 A240
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 A240.

Feature	GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+	Radeon R5 A240
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ draws 150W versus the Radeon R5 A240's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon R5 A240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+) vs 350W (Radeon R5 A240). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+	Radeon R5 A240
TDP	150W	30W-80%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	3.8	19.2+405%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ came in at $229, while the Radeon R5 A240 launched at $100. On MSRP, Radeon R5 A240 was 56.3% cheaper ($129 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+) vs 5.8 (Radeon R5 A240) — the Radeon R5 A240 offers 132% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 A240 (2013 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+	Radeon R5 A240
MSRP	$229	$100-56%
Performance per Dollar	2.5	5.8+132%
Codename	NB9E-GTX	Oland
Release	July 15 2008	October 8 2013
Ranking	#825	#911

Search GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 A240 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.