GeForce 9800 GX2 vs GeForce GTX 1650

CPU

GPU

GeForce 9800 GX2

2008Core: 500 MHz

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce 9800 GX2

150

613

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce GTX 1650

7,869

+1183.7%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 9800 GX2 is positioned at rank #691 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9800 GX2

#681

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

10644%

#683

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

9649%

#684

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

9624%

#688

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

8751%

#689

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

8691%

#691

GeForce 9800 GX2

MSRP: $599|Avg: $75

100%

#692

GeForce 7900 GS

MSRP: $259|Avg: $50

99%

#693

MOBILITY RADEON X600

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

98%

#694

Mobility Radeon HD 4250

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

96%

#695

Mobility Radeon X2300 HD

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

96%

#696

Mobility Radeon X2300

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

96%

#697

Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $12

94%

#698

GeForce 8600 GTS

MSRP: $199|Avg: $35

91%

#699

GeForce 8800 GTX

MSRP: $599|Avg: $50

91%

#700

GeForce 8800 GTS

MSRP: $449|Avg: $50

89%

#701

Mobility Radeon HD 3450

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

89%

#702

GeForce 7650 GS

MSRP: $150|Avg: $15

87%

#703

GeForce 8600M GS

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

87%

#704

Mobility Radeon X1400

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

86%

#705

GeForce 8600 GT

MSRP: $159|Avg: $15

86%

#706

GeForce 7900 GT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2008). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 9800 GX2 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1183.7% higher G3D Mark score and 199900% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9800 GX2.

Insight	GeForce 9800 GX2	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1183.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1183.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+199900%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	Standard Size (267mm)	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $75), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1183.7% better value per dollar than the GeForce 9800 GX2.

Insight	GeForce 9800 GX2	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+1183.7%)
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce 9800 GX2 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9800 GX2 and GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce 9800 GX2

The GeForce 9800 GX2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 613 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 9800 GX2 scores 613 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 1183.7%. The GeForce 9800 GX2 is built on G9x while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 65 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9800 GX2) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	GeForce 9800 GX2	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	613	7,869+1184%
Architecture	G9x	Turing
Process Node	65 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	224	896+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 9800 GX2	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9800 GX2 comes with 2 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 199900% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce 9800 GX2	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	0.002 GB	4 GB+199900%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	128 GB/s
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9800 GX2) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: None vs 1.4. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce 9800 GX2	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	10.0	12+20%
Vulkan	None	1.4
OpenGL	3.3	4.6+39%
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9800 GX2) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 9800 GX2) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	GeForce 9800 GX2	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	No	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP2	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9800 GX2 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9800 GX2) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 105°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce 9800 GX2	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	150W	75W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	Legacy	None
Length	267mm	229mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	105°C	70°C-33%
Perf/Watt	4.1	104.9+2459%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 9800 GX2 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.2 (GeForce 9800 GX2) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1179.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2008).