GeForce 9800 GX2 vs GRID K160Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9800 GX2 vs GRID K160Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9800 GX2 vs GRID K160Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9800 GX2

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 2 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
379.2% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$125 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).

GRID K160Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $474 less on MSRP ($125 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 390.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅24900% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 2 MB).
✅GeForce 9800 GX2 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GRID K160Q is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID K160Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (628 vs 613), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K160Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 2 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 65nm, and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID K160Q makes the most sense to buy today. It is $474 cheaper on MSRP at $125 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 390.9% (5.0 vs 1.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 9800 GX2 vs GRID K160Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9800 GX2

The GeForce 9800 GX2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 613 points.

GRID K160Q

The GRID K160Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 628 points. Launch price was $937.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9800 GX2 scores 613 and the GRID K160Q reaches 628 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9800 GX2 is built on G9x while the GRID K160Q uses Kepler, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9800 GX2) vs 1,536 (GRID K160Q).

Feature	GeForce 9800 GX2	GRID K160Q
G3D Mark Score	613	628+2%
Architecture	G9x	Kepler
Process Node	65 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	224	1536+586%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9800 GX2 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID K160Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 9800 GX2	GRID K160Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9800 GX2 has 2 MB of VRAM, while the GRID K160Q carries 512 MB. GRID K160Q gives you 24900% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 9800 GX2 and 64-bit on the GRID K160Q.

Feature	GeForce 9800 GX2	GRID K160Q
VRAM Capacity	0.002 GB	0.5 GB+24900%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9800 GX2 draws 150W versus the GRID K160Q's 225W — a 40% difference. The GeForce 9800 GX2 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9800 GX2) vs 350W (GRID K160Q). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce 9800 GX2	GRID K160Q
TDP	150W-33%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	105°C	—
Perf/Watt	4.1+46%	2.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9800 GX2 came in at $599, while the GRID K160Q launched at $125. On MSRP, GRID K160Q was 79.1% cheaper ($474 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (GeForce 9800 GX2) vs 5.0 (GRID K160Q) — the GRID K160Q offers 400% better value. The newer card here is GRID K160Q (2013 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 9800 GX2	GRID K160Q
MSRP	$599	$125-79%
Performance per Dollar	1.0	5.0+400%
Codename	NB9E-GTX	GK104
Release	July 15 2008	June 28 2013
Ranking	#825	#589

Search GeForce 9800 GX2 on Amazon

Search GRID K160Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.