G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9800M GTX vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9800M GTX vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9800M GTX

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
101.3% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅621.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 3389.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
✅GeForce 9800M GTX is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 621.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1633.3% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 454), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 65nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $151 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3389.8% (52.8 vs 1.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 9800M GTX vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9800M GTX

The GeForce 9800M GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 454 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 9800M GTX scores 454 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 1633.3%. The GeForce 9800M GTX is built on G9x while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 65 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9800M GTX) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	GeForce 9800M GTX	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	454	7,869+1633%
Architecture	G9x	Turing
Process Node	65 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	224	896+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 9800M GTX	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9800M GTX has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 9800M GTX and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650.

Feature	GeForce 9800M GTX	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	4 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	128 GB/s
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9800M GTX) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: None vs 1.4. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce 9800M GTX	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	10.0	12+20%
Vulkan	None	1.4
OpenGL	3.3	4.6+39%
Max Displays	1	3+200%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9800M GTX) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9800M GTX) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	GeForce 9800M GTX	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	No	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP3	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9800M GTX draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9800M GTX) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce 9800M GTX	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	150W	75W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	0mm	229mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	90°C	70°C-22%
Perf/Watt	3.0	104.9+3397%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9800M GTX came in at $300, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 50.3% cheaper ($151 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (GeForce 9800M GTX) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 3420% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 9800M GTX	GeForce GTX 1650
MSRP	$300	$149-50%
Performance per Dollar	1.5	52.8+3420%
Codename	NB9E-GTX	TU117
Release	July 15 2008	April 23 2019
Ranking	#825	#323

Search GeForce 9800M GTX on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.