
GeForce 9800M GTX

Radeon R5 M240
GeForce 9800M GTX vs Radeon R5 M240 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9800M GTX vs Radeon R5 M240 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 9800M GTX vs Radeon R5 M240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9800M GTX
2008Why buy it
- ✅53.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌200% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 4.7 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.
Radeon R5 M240
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 212.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.7 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 9800M GTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9800M GTX vs Radeon R5 M240 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9800M GTX
The GeForce 9800M GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 454 points.

Radeon R5 M240
The Radeon R5 M240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 473 points. Launch price was $69.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9800M GTX scores 454 and the Radeon R5 M240 reaches 473 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9800M GTX is built on G9x while the Radeon R5 M240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9800M GTX) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M240).
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GTX | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 454 | 473+4% |
| Architecture | G9x | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 320+43% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 9800M GTX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 M240 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GTX | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9800M GTX has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M240 carries 512 MB. GeForce 9800M GTX gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 9800M GTX and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M240.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GTX | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9800M GTX) vs 12 (Radeon R5 M240). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GTX | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 12+20% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9800M GTX) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 M240). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GTX | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9800M GTX draws 150W versus the Radeon R5 M240's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon R5 M240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9800M GTX) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M240). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GTX | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 30W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.0 | 15.8+427% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 9800M GTX came in at $300, while the Radeon R5 M240 launched at $100. On MSRP, Radeon R5 M240 was 66.7% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (GeForce 9800M GTX) vs 4.7 (Radeon R5 M240) — the Radeon R5 M240 offers 213.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 M240 (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GTX | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $100-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.5 | 4.7+213% |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | Oland |
| Release | July 15 2008 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #825 | #911 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














