G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5100 vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5100

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Measures 160mm instead of 229mm, a 69mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌666.7% higher power demand at 575W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅6866.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 65915.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 575W, a 500W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌43.1% longer card at 229mm vs 160mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6866.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 98262.5% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 8), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce FX 5100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 12nm, 170 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $49 more expensive on MSRP at $149 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 65915.1% (52.8 vs 0.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce FX 5100 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce FX 5100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5100

The GeForce FX 5100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $1,999.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5100 scores 8 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 98262.5%. The GeForce FX 5100 is built on Rankine while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX 5100) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5100) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	GeForce FX 5100	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	8	7,869+98263%
Architecture	Rankine	Turing
Process Node	5 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	21760+2329%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	104.8 TFLOPS+3412%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2407 MHz+45%	1665 MHz
ROPs	176+450%	32
TMUs	680+1114%	56
L1 Cache	21.3 MB+2320%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	96 MB+9500%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce FX 5100	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5100 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5100 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce FX 5100) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce FX 5100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce FX 5100	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	128 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	96 MB+9500%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5100) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.4. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce FX 5100	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	9.0a	12+33%
Vulkan	N/A	1.4
OpenGL	1.5	4.6+207%
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce FX 5100) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: None vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5100) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	GeForce FX 5100	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	None	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	None	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	MPEG-2	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5100 draws 575W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 153.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5100) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 160mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65 vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce FX 5100	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	575W	75W-87%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	Legacy	None
Length	160mm	229mm
Height	100mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	65-7%	70°C
Perf/Watt	0.0	104.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5100 came in at $100, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5100 was 32.9% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (GeForce FX 5100) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 52700% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5100 (2025 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce FX 5100	GeForce GTX 1650
MSRP	$100-33%	$149
Performance per Dollar	0.1	52.8+52700%
Codename	GB202	TU117
Release	January 30 2025	April 23 2019
Ranking	#3	#323

Search GeForce FX 5100 on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.