
GeForce FX 5100 vs Quadro FX 500/600 PCI

GeForce FX 5100
Popular choices:

Quadro FX 500/600 PCI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce FX 5100 is positioned at rank #379 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5100
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce FX 5100 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2008). The GeForce FX 5100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 75% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX 5100.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5100 | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-75%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+75%) |
| Longevity | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce FX 5100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $500 for the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI, it costs 98% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 2757.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5100 | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2757.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5100 and Quadro FX 500/600 PCI

GeForce FX 5100
The GeForce FX 5100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Quadro FX 500/600 PCI
The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5100 scores 8 versus the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI's 14 — the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI leads by 75%. The GeForce FX 5100 is built on Rankine while the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI uses Tesla 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX 5100) vs 240 (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5100) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5100 | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8 | 14+75% |
| Architecture | Rankine | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760+8967% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS+16746% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 176+450% | 32 |
| TMUs | 680+750% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+38300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5100 | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5100 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI has 4 GB. The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce FX 5100) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) — the GeForce FX 5100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5100 | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+38300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5100) vs 9_0a (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5100 | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9_0a |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5100 draws 575W versus the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI's 189W — a 101% difference. The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5100) vs 350W (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5100 | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W | 189W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 168mm |
| Height | 100mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce FX 5100 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI launched at $0 and now averages $500. The GeForce FX 5100 costs 98% less ($490 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.8 (GeForce FX 5100) vs 0.0 (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) — the GeForce FX 5100 offers 100+% better value. The GeForce FX 5100 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5100 | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-98% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| Codename | GB202 | GT200B |
| Release | January 30 2025 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #3 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














