GeForce FX 5700LE vs Quadro FX 2000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5700LE vs Quadro FX 2000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5700LE vs Quadro FX 2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5700LE

2010

Why buy it

✅+38.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $2,900 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 4066.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌253.2% higher power demand at 219W vs 62W.

Quadro FX 2000

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 62W instead of 219W, a 157W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (18 vs 25).
❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
2900% HIGHER MSRP
$3,000 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce FX 5700LE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 38.9% in PassMark G3D (25 vs 18), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce FX 5700LE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 256 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce FX 5700LE makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,900 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $3,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 4066.7% (0.3 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce FX 5700LE vs Quadro FX 2000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5700LE

The GeForce FX 5700LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25 points. Launch price was $349.

Quadro FX 2000

The Quadro FX 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5700LE scores 25 versus the Quadro FX 2000's 18 — the GeForce FX 5700LE leads by 38.9%. The GeForce FX 5700LE is built on Rankine while the Quadro FX 2000 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 480 (GeForce FX 5700LE) vs 192 (Quadro FX 2000). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700LE) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2000).

Feature	GeForce FX 5700LE	Quadro FX 2000
G3D Mark Score	25+39%	18
Architecture	Rankine	Fermi
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	480+150%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.405 TFLOPS+193%	0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs	40+150%	16
TMUs	60+88%	32
L1 Cache	960 KB+275%	256 KB
L2 Cache	640 KB+150%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce FX 5700LE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 2000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700LE	Quadro FX 2000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5700LE has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 2000 carries 128 MB. GeForce FX 5700LE gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5700LE and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 2000. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce FX 5700LE) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 2000) — the GeForce FX 5700LE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700LE	Quadro FX 2000
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB+100%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	640 KB+150%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5700LE draws 219W versus the Quadro FX 2000's 62W — a 111.7% difference. The Quadro FX 2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700LE) vs 350W (Quadro FX 2000). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700LE	Quadro FX 2000
TDP	219W	62W-72%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Slots	1	—
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.3+200%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5700LE came in at $100, while the Quadro FX 2000 launched at $3000. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5700LE was 96.7% cheaper ($2900 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (GeForce FX 5700LE) vs 0.0 (Quadro FX 2000) — the GeForce FX 5700LE offers 100+% better value.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700LE	Quadro FX 2000
MSRP	$100-97%	$3000
Performance per Dollar	0.3	0.0
Codename	GF110	GF106
Release	December 7 2010	December 24 2010
Ranking	#497	#902

Search GeForce FX 5700LE on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 2000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.