GeForce FX 5700LE vs RADEON 9800 SE

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5700LE

2010Core: 732 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

RADEON 9800 SE

2025Core: 1295 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
Similar parts
······

GeForce FX 5700LE vs RADEON 9800 SE Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5700LE vs RADEON 9800 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5700LE vs RADEON 9800 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5700LE

2010

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 298.2% higher power demand at 219W vs 55W.

RADEON 9800 SE

2025

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 55W instead of 219W, a 164W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce FX 5700LE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.2% in PassMark G3D (25 vs 24), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON 9800 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 40nm, 40 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2010. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5700LE makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce FX 5700LE is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON 9800 SE has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce FX 5700LE vs RADEON 9800 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5700LE

The GeForce FX 5700LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25 points. Launch price was $349.

AMD

RADEON 9800 SE

The RADEON 9800 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce FX 5700LE scores 25 and the RADEON 9800 SE reaches 24 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce FX 5700LE is built on Rankine while the RADEON 9800 SE uses RDNA 3.5, both on 40 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce FX 5700LE) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9800 SE). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700LE) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9800 SE).

FeatureGeForce FX 5700LERADEON 9800 SE
G3D Mark Score
25+4%
24
Architecture
Rankine
RDNA 3.5
Process Node
40 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
480
2560+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.405 TFLOPS
14.85 TFLOPS+957%
ROPs
40
64+60%
TMUs
60
160+167%
L2 Cache
0.63 MB
8 MB+1170%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce FX 5700LE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9800 SE leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce FX 5700LERADEON 9800 SE
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5700LE and 64-bit on the RADEON 9800 SE. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce FX 5700LE) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9800 SE) — the RADEON 9800 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX 5700LERADEON 9800 SE
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.63 MB
8 MB+1170%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5700LE draws 219W versus the RADEON 9800 SE's 55W — a 119.7% difference. The RADEON 9800 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700LE) vs 350W (RADEON 9800 SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

FeatureGeForce FX 5700LERADEON 9800 SE
TDP
219W
55W-75%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
0.1
0.4+300%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5700LE came in at $100, while the RADEON 9800 SE launched at $0. On MSRP, RADEON 9800 SE was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (GeForce FX 5700LE) vs Infinity (RADEON 9800 SE) — the RADEON 9800 SE offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9800 SE (2025 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce FX 5700LERADEON 9800 SE
MSRP
$100
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
0.3
Infinity
Codename
GF110
Strix Halo
Release
December 7 2010
January 6 2025
Ranking
#497
#98

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.