G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5700VE vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5700VE vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5700VE

2010

Why buy it

✅Measures 170mm instead of 229mm, a 59mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌192% higher power demand at 219W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅6866.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 256 MB).
✅GeForce FX 5700VE is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 219W, a 144W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌34.7% longer card at 229mm vs 170mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6866.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 23745.5% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 33), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce FX 5700VE vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5700VE

The GeForce FX 5700VE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points. Launch price was $349.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5700VE scores 33 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 23745.5%. The GeForce FX 5700VE is built on Rankine while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 40 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce FX 5700VE) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700VE) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	GeForce FX 5700VE	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	33	7,869+23745%
Architecture	Rankine	Turing
Process Node	40 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	480	896+87%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.405 TFLOPS	2.984 TFLOPS+112%
ROPs	40+25%	32
TMUs	60+7%	56
L1 Cache	960 KB+7%	896 KB
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	1 MB+59%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce FX 5700VE	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5700VE has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5700VE and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce FX 5700VE) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700VE	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	4 GB+1500%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	128 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	1 MB+59%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700VE) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.4. OpenGL: 2.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700VE	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	9.0a	12+33%
Vulkan	N/A	1.4
OpenGL	2.0	4.6+130%
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce FX 5700VE) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: MPEG-2 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5700VE) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	GeForce FX 5700VE	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	None	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	MPEG-2	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	MPEG-2	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5700VE draws 219W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 98% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700VE) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 170mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700VE	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	219W	75W-66%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	Legacy	None
Length	170mm	229mm
Height	100mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	75	70°C-7%
Perf/Watt	0.2	104.9+52350%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5700VE came in at $0, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5700VE was 100+% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce FX 5700VE) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce FX 5700VE offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce FX 5700VE	GeForce GTX 1650
MSRP	$0-100%	$149
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	52.8
Codename	GF110	TU117
Release	December 7 2010	April 23 2019
Ranking	#497	#323

Search GeForce FX 5700VE on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.