
GeForce FX Go 5200

GeForce4 Ti 4600
GeForce FX Go 5200 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce FX Go 5200 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce FX Go 5200 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce FX Go 5200
2025Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 32 MB vs 128 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌259.4% higher power demand at 575W vs 160W.
GeForce4 Ti 4600
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅303.2% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (128 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 575W, a 415W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6 vs 8).
- ❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX Go 5200 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX Go 5200
The GeForce FX Go 5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $1,999.

GeForce4 Ti 4600
The GeForce4 Ti 4600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX Go 5200 scores 8 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4600's 6 — the GeForce FX Go 5200 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce FX Go 5200 is built on Rankine while the GeForce4 Ti 4600 uses Fermi, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs 336 (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4600).
| Feature | GeForce FX Go 5200 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8+33% | 6 |
| Architecture | Rankine | Fermi |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760+6376% | 336 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS+11452% | 0.9072 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 176+450% | 32 |
| TMUs | 680+1114% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 21.3 MB+4741% | 0.44 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+19100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX Go 5200 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX Go 5200 has 32 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 Ti 4600 carries 128 MB. GeForce4 Ti 4600 gives you 303.2% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX Go 5200 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4600. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4600) — the GeForce FX Go 5200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go 5200 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.031 GB | 0.125 GB+303% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+19100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go 5200 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a+11% | 8.1 |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 1.5+15% | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Decoder: No vs No.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go 5200 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | No |
| Decoder | No | No |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX Go 5200 draws 575W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4600's 160W — a 112.9% difference. The GeForce4 Ti 4600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 216mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go 5200 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W | 160W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 216mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 65°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce FX Go 5200 (2025 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce FX Go 5200 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $399 |
| Codename | GB202 | GF104 |
| Release | January 30 2025 | July 12 2010 |
| Ranking | #3 | #652 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













