GeForce FX Go 5200 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600

NVIDIA

GeForce FX Go 5200

2025Core: 2017 MHzBoost: 2407 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce4 Ti 4600

2010Core: 675 MHz
Similar parts
······

GeForce FX Go 5200 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX Go 5200 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX Go 5200 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX Go 5200

2025

Why buy it

  • +33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 32 MB vs 128 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • 259.4% higher power demand at 575W vs 160W.

GeForce4 Ti 4600

2010

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 303.2% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (128 MB vs 32 MB).
  • Draws 160W instead of 575W, a 415W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (6 vs 8).
  • 2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce FX Go 5200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (8 vs 6), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce FX Go 5200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 40nm, 170 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2010. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce4 Ti 4600 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce4 Ti 4600 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce FX Go 5200 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce FX Go 5200 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX Go 5200

The GeForce FX Go 5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $1,999.

NVIDIA

GeForce4 Ti 4600

The GeForce4 Ti 4600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $229.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX Go 5200 scores 8 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4600's 6 — the GeForce FX Go 5200 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce FX Go 5200 is built on Rankine while the GeForce4 Ti 4600 uses Fermi, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs 336 (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4600).

FeatureGeForce FX Go 5200GeForce4 Ti 4600
G3D Mark Score
8+33%
6
Architecture
Rankine
Fermi
Process Node
5 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
21760+6376%
336
Compute (TFLOPS)
104.8 TFLOPS+11452%
0.9072 TFLOPS
ROPs
176+450%
32
TMUs
680+1114%
56
L1 Cache
21.3 MB+4741%
0.44 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB+19100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce FX Go 5200GeForce4 Ti 4600
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX Go 5200 has 32 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 Ti 4600 carries 128 MB. GeForce4 Ti 4600 gives you 303.2% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX Go 5200 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4600. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4600) — the GeForce FX Go 5200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX Go 5200GeForce4 Ti 4600
VRAM Capacity
0.031 GB
0.125 GB+303%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
96 MB+19100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce FX Go 5200GeForce4 Ti 4600
DirectX
9.0a+11%
8.1
Vulkan
None
None
OpenGL
1.5+15%
1.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Decoder: No vs No.

FeatureGeForce FX Go 5200GeForce4 Ti 4600
Encoder
No
No
Decoder
No
No
Codecs
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX Go 5200 draws 575W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4600's 160W — a 112.9% difference. The GeForce4 Ti 4600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 216mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.

FeatureGeForce FX Go 5200GeForce4 Ti 4600
TDP
575W
160W-72%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
216mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
65°C-13%
Perf/Watt
0.0
0.0
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce FX Go 5200 (2025 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce FX Go 5200GeForce4 Ti 4600
MSRP
$399
Codename
GB202
GF104
Release
January 30 2025
July 12 2010
Ranking
#3
#652

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.