GeForce FX Go 5200 vs RADEON IGP 350M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX Go 5200 vs RADEON IGP 350M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX Go 5200 vs RADEON IGP 350M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX Go 5200

2025

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 32 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌945.5% higher power demand at 575W vs 55W.

RADEON IGP 350M

2016

Why buy it

✅1512.9% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 575W, a 520W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6 vs 8).
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce FX Go 5200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (8 vs 6), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce FX Go 5200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 170 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce FX Go 5200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce FX Go 5200 vs RADEON IGP 350M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX Go 5200

The GeForce FX Go 5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $1,999.

RADEON IGP 350M

The RADEON IGP 350M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX Go 5200 scores 8 versus the RADEON IGP 350M's 6 — the GeForce FX Go 5200 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce FX Go 5200 is built on Rankine while the RADEON IGP 350M uses GCN 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs 512 (RADEON IGP 350M). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 350M).

Feature	GeForce FX Go 5200	RADEON IGP 350M
G3D Mark Score	8+33%	6
Architecture	Rankine	GCN 1.0
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	21760+4150%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	104.8 TFLOPS+12693%	0.8192 TFLOPS
ROPs	176+1000%	16
TMUs	680+2025%	32
L1 Cache	21.3 MB+16285%	0.13 MB
L2 Cache	96 MB+38300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce FX Go 5200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON IGP 350M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce FX Go 5200	RADEON IGP 350M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX Go 5200 has 32 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON IGP 350M carries 512 MB. RADEON IGP 350M gives you 1512.9% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX Go 5200 and 64-bit on the RADEON IGP 350M. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs 0.25 MB (RADEON IGP 350M) — the GeForce FX Go 5200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce FX Go 5200	RADEON IGP 350M
VRAM Capacity	0.031 GB	0.5 GB+1513%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	96 MB+38300%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX Go 5200 draws 575W versus the RADEON IGP 350M's 55W — a 165.1% difference. The RADEON IGP 350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX Go 5200) vs 350W (RADEON IGP 350M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.