GeForce FX Go5300 vs GeForce FX Go5650

NVIDIA

GeForce FX Go5300

2025Core: 2017 MHzBoost: 2407 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce FX Go5650

2011Core: 810 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce FX Go5300 vs GeForce FX Go5650 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX Go5300 vs GeForce FX Go5650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX Go5300 vs GeForce FX Go5650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX Go5300

2025

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (13 vs 17).
  • 283.3% higher power demand at 575W vs 150W.

GeForce FX Go5650

2011

Why buy it

  • +30.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Draws 150W instead of 575W, a 425W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce FX Go5650 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 30.8% in PassMark G3D (17 vs 13), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce FX Go5300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 40nm, 170 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2011. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX Go5650 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce FX Go5650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce FX Go5300 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce FX Go5300 vs GeForce FX Go5650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX Go5300

The GeForce FX Go5300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13 points. Launch price was $1,999.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX Go5650

The GeForce FX Go5650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17 points. Launch price was $199.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX Go5300 scores 13 versus the GeForce FX Go5650's 17 — the GeForce FX Go5650 leads by 30.8%. The GeForce FX Go5300 is built on Rankine while the GeForce FX Go5650 uses Rankine, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX Go5300) vs 336 (GeForce FX Go5650). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go5300) vs 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go5650).

FeatureGeForce FX Go5300GeForce FX Go5650
G3D Mark Score
13
17+31%
Architecture
Rankine
Rankine
Process Node
5 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
21760+6376%
336
Compute (TFLOPS)
104.8 TFLOPS+9524%
1.089 TFLOPS
ROPs
176+450%
32
TMUs
680+1114%
56
L1 Cache
21.3 MB+4741%
0.44 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB+19100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce FX Go5300GeForce FX Go5650
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX Go5300 and 128-bit on the GeForce FX Go5650. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce FX Go5300) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce FX Go5650) — the GeForce FX Go5300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX Go5300GeForce FX Go5650
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
96 MB+19100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX Go5300) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX Go5650). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce FX Go5300GeForce FX Go5650
DirectX
9.0a
9.0a
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VPE 3.0 (GeForce FX Go5300) vs VPE 3.0 (GeForce FX Go5650). Decoder: VPE 3.0 vs VPE 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX Go5300) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce FX Go5650).

FeatureGeForce FX Go5300GeForce FX Go5650
Encoder
VPE 3.0
VPE 3.0
Decoder
VPE 3.0
VPE 3.0
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX Go5300 draws 575W versus the GeForce FX Go5650's 150W — a 117.2% difference. The GeForce FX Go5650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX Go5300) vs 350W (GeForce FX Go5650). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce FX Go5300GeForce FX Go5650
TDP
575W
150W-74%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
80°C
Perf/Watt
0.0
0.1