
GeForce FX Go5300

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce FX Go5300 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce FX Go5300 vs GeForce RTX 4070 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce FX Go5300 vs GeForce RTX 4070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce FX Go5300
2025Why buy it
- ✅269.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (680 vs 184).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅19124.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 680), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX Go5300 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX Go5300
The GeForce FX Go5300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13 points. Launch price was $1,999.

GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX Go5300 scores 13 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 206969.2%. The GeForce FX Go5300 is built on Rankine while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX Go5300) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go5300) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 170 RT cores (GeForce FX Go5300) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 4070) with 680 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5300 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13 | 26,919+206969% |
| Architecture | Rankine | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760+270% | 5888 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS+260% | 29.15 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2407 MHz | 2475 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 176+175% | 64 |
| TMUs | 680+270% | 184 |
| L1 Cache | 21.3 MB+267% | 5.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+167% | 36 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 170+270% | 46 |
| Tensor Cores | 680+270% | 184 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce FX Go5300 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce FX Go5300 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5300 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX Go5300 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 2300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX Go5300 and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce FX Go5300) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce FX Go5300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5300 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 12 GB+2300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 504 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+167% | 36 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX Go5300) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5300 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 12.2+36% |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6+119% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VPE 3.0 (GeForce FX Go5300) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: VPE 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX Go5300) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5300 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VPE 3.0 | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | VPE 3.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX Go5300 draws 575W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 96.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX Go5300) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5300 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W | 200W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 304mm |
| Height | — | 137mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 134.6 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce FX Go5300 (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5300 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $599 |
| Codename | GB202 | AD104 |
| Release | January 30 2025 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #3 | #32 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













