GeForce FX Go5300 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX Go5300 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX Go5300 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX Go5300

2025

Why buy it

✅+85.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌283.3% higher power demand at 575W vs 150W.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

2010

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 150W instead of 575W, a 425W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7 vs 13).
❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce FX Go5300 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 85.7% in PassMark G3D (13 vs 7), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce FX Go5300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 40nm, 170 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2010. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce FX Go5300 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce FX Go5300 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX Go5300

The GeForce FX Go5300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13 points. Launch price was $1,999.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $160.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX Go5300 scores 13 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE's 7 — the GeForce FX Go5300 leads by 85.7%. The GeForce FX Go5300 is built on Rankine while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE uses Fermi, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX Go5300) vs 288 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go5300) vs 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE).

Feature	GeForce FX Go5300	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
G3D Mark Score	13+86%	7
Architecture	Rankine	Fermi
Process Node	5 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	21760+7456%	288
Compute (TFLOPS)	104.8 TFLOPS+13896%	0.7488 TFLOPS
ROPs	176+450%	32
TMUs	680+1317%	48
L1 Cache	21.3 MB+5505%	0.38 MB
L2 Cache	96 MB+19100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce FX Go5300	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX Go5300 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce FX Go5300) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) — the GeForce FX Go5300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce FX Go5300	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	96 MB+19100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX Go5300) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce FX Go5300	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
DirectX	9.0a+11%	8.1
OpenGL	2.1+62%	1.3
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VPE 3.0 (GeForce FX Go5300) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Decoder: VPE 3.0 vs No.

Feature	GeForce FX Go5300	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
Encoder	VPE 3.0	No
Decoder	VPE 3.0	No
Codecs	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX Go5300 draws 575W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE's 150W — a 117.2% difference. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX Go5300) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 65°C.

Feature	GeForce FX Go5300	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
TDP	575W	150W-74%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	—	216mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	80°C	65°C-19%
Perf/Watt	0.0	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce FX Go5300 (2025 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce FX Go5300	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
MSRP	—	$299
Codename	GB202	GF104
Release	January 30 2025	November 15 2010
Ranking	#3	#683

Search GeForce FX Go5300 on Amazon

Search GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.