CPU
GPU
GeForce G100
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 380
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce G100 is positioned at rank 247 and the Quadro FX 380 is on rank 327, so the GeForce G100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce G100
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 380
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce G100 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2008). The GeForce G100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 380 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 380 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce G100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce G100 | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce G100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce G100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $15), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 198.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce G100 | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+198.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($5) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce G100 and Quadro FX 380
GeForce G100
The GeForce G100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 176 points. Launch price was $79.
Quadro FX 380
The Quadro FX 380 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 177 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce G100 scores 176 and the Quadro FX 380 reaches 177 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce G100 is built on Pascal while the Quadro FX 380 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce G100) vs 240 (Quadro FX 380). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G100) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 380).
| Feature | GeForce G100 | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 176 | 177 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+60% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.127 TFLOPS+81% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 80+233% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce G100 | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce G100 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 380 has 256 MB. The GeForce G100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce G100) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 380) — the GeForce G100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce G100 | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce G100) vs 10_0 (Quadro FX 380). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce G100 | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10_0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce G100 draws 30W versus the Quadro FX 380's 189W — a 145.2% difference. The GeForce G100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G100) vs 350W (Quadro FX 380). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce G100 | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-84% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 5.9+556% | 0.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce G100 launched at $40 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the Quadro FX 380 launched at $129 and now averages $15. The GeForce G100 costs 66.7% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.2 (GeForce G100) vs 11.8 (Quadro FX 380) — the GeForce G100 offers 198.3% better value. The GeForce G100 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce G100 | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $40-69% | $129 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-67% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.2+198% | 11.8 |
| Codename | GP108 | GT200B |
| Release | May 17 2017 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #641 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce G100 and Quadro FX 380
