GeForce G102M vs Radeon HD 3670

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce G102M is positioned at rank 156 and the Radeon HD 3670 is on rank 320, so the GeForce G102M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce G102M

#42

Radeon RX 6600S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

97%

#43

Radeon RX 8060S

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

95%

#146

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

323%

#148

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

293%

#149

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

292%

#153

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

266%

#154

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

264%

#156

GeForce G102M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#157

GeForce 830M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

100%

#158

GeForce GT 750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

99%

#159

GeForce GT 425M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

99%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3670

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

4292%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

4124%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

4076%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

4069%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

4060%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

4037%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

3986%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

3972%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

3935%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

3924%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

3877%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

3869%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

3799%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

3796%

#305

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

4734%

#320

Radeon HD 3670

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

100%

#321

Radeon HD 3200

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

97%

#322

Radeon HD 2350

MSRP: $50|Avg: $48

91%

#323

Radeon HD 2400

MSRP: $79|Avg: $10

91%

#324

Radeon HD 2400 XT

MSRP: $79|Avg: $10

89%

#326

GeForce 7300 GT

MSRP: $89|Avg: $20

82%

#327

Radeon HD 3870 X2

MSRP: $449|Avg: $40

78%

#329

GeForce 7950 GT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $50

69%

#330

RADEON X550XT

MSRP: $50|Avg: $40

66%

#334

Radeon X1650 Pro

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

50%

#335

RADEON X550

MSRP: $60|Avg: $10

50%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 3670 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce G102M.

Insight	GeForce G102M	Radeon HD 3670
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 3670 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce G102M Benchmark Check

Radeon HD 3670 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

No prediction data available

League of Legends

Valorant

No prediction data available

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce G102M and Radeon HD 3670

GeForce G102M

The GeForce G102M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 168 points.

Radeon HD 3670

The Radeon HD 3670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 169 points. Launch price was $369.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce G102M scores 168 and the Radeon HD 3670 reaches 169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce G102M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 3670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce G102M) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 3670). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce G102M) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3670). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 880 MHz.

Feature	GeForce G102M	Radeon HD 3670
G3D Mark Score	168	169
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale 3
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	1536+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9032 TFLOPS	2.703 TFLOPS+199%
Boost Clock	1176 MHz+34%	880 MHz
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	96+300%
L1 Cache	192 KB	192 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce G102M	Radeon HD 3670
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce G102M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 3670) — the GeForce G102M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce G102M	Radeon HD 3670
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce G102M) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 3670). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce G102M	Radeon HD 3670
DirectX	10.0	10.1
Max Displays	1	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce G102M) vs UVD (Radeon HD 3670). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD.

Feature	GeForce G102M	Radeon HD 3670
Encoder	No	UVD
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP3	UVD
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce G102M draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 3670's 250W — a 153.4% difference. The GeForce G102M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G102M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3670). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.