GeForce Go 7800 vs GeForce 9300M GS
GeForce Go 7800
Popular choices:
GeForce 9300M GS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce Go 7800 is positioned at rank 265 and the GeForce 9300M GS is on rank 686, so the GeForce Go 7800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7800
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9300M GS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9300M GS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 7800.
| Insight | GeForce Go 7800 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 9300M GS remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 7800 and GeForce 9300M GS
GeForce Go 7800
The GeForce Go 7800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 115 points. Launch price was $649.
GeForce 9300M GS
The GeForce 9300M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 118 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce Go 7800 scores 115 and the GeForce 9300M GS reaches 118 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 7800 is built on Kepler while the GeForce 9300M GS uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce Go 7800) vs 384 (GeForce 9300M GS). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7800) vs 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300M GS). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 549 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 115 | 118+3% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+500% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS+886% | 0.4216 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz+64% | 549 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+500% | 8 |
| TMUs | 192+700% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce Go 7800) vs 1 MB (GeForce 9300M GS) — the GeForce Go 7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7800) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9300M GS). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 10.0+11% |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3+57% |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce Go 7800) vs No (GeForce 9300M GS). Decoder: PureVideo vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce Go 7800) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9300M GS).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo | PureVideo HD VP3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 7800 draws 250W versus the GeForce 9300M GS's 33W — a 153.4% difference. The GeForce 9300M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7800) vs 350W (GeForce 9300M GS). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 33W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 3.6+620% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9300M GS is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $10 |
| Codename | GK110 | GM108 |
| Release | May 23 2013 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #320 | #880 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce Go 7800 and GeForce 9300M GS
