GeForce Go 7900 GS vs Quadro FX 380
GeForce Go 7900 GS
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 380
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce Go 7900 GS is positioned at rank 383 and the Quadro FX 380 is on rank 327, so the Quadro FX 380 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7900 GS
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 380
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce Go 7900 GS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 380.
| Insight | GeForce Go 7900 GS | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 7900 GS remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 7900 GS and Quadro FX 380
GeForce Go 7900 GS
The GeForce Go 7900 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 967 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 178 points.
Quadro FX 380
The Quadro FX 380 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 177 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce Go 7900 GS scores 178 and the Quadro FX 380 reaches 177 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 7900 GS is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 380 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce Go 7900 GS) vs 240 (Quadro FX 380).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7900 GS | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 178 | 177 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+220% | 240 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce Go 7900 GS | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7900 GS | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7900 GS) vs 10_0 (Quadro FX 380). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7900 GS | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 10_0+11% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 7900 GS draws 30W versus the Quadro FX 380's 189W — a 145.2% difference. The GeForce Go 7900 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7900 GS) vs 350W (Quadro FX 380). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7900 GS | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-84% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 5.9+556% | 0.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce Go 7900 GS is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7900 GS | Quadro FX 380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $129 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $15 |
| Codename | N14P-GT | GT200B |
| Release | April 1 2013 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #616 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce Go 7900 GS and Quadro FX 380
