GeForce GT 120 vs Radeon HD 8210

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 120 vs Radeon HD 8210 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 120 vs Radeon HD 8210: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 120

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 200W, a 170W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8210 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
185.7% HIGHER MSRP
$100 MSRPvs$35 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).

Radeon HD 8210

2012

Why buy it

✅5.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $65 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 196.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.6 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌566.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 8210 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (195 vs 188), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 120 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 8210 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $65 cheaper on MSRP at $35 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 196.4% (5.6 vs 1.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8210 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 120 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 120 vs Radeon HD 8210 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 120

The GeForce GT 120 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 188 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon HD 8210

The Radeon HD 8210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 195 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 120 scores 188 and the Radeon HD 8210 reaches 195 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 120 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 8210 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 120) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8210). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 120) vs 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8210).

Feature	GeForce GT 120	Radeon HD 8210
G3D Mark Score	188	195+4%
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	1280+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.127 TFLOPS	2.56 TFLOPS+127%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	80+233%
L1 Cache	144 KB	320 KB+122%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 120 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8210 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 120	Radeon HD 8210
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 120 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8210.

Feature	GeForce GT 120	Radeon HD 8210
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 120 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 8210's 200W — a 147.8% difference. The GeForce GT 120 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 120) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8210). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce GT 120	Radeon HD 8210
TDP	30W-85%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	168mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	6.3+530%	1.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 120 came in at $100, while the Radeon HD 8210 launched at $35. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8210 was 65% cheaper ($65 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (GeForce GT 120) vs 5.6 (Radeon HD 8210) — the Radeon HD 8210 offers 194.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 120 (2017 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GT 120	Radeon HD 8210
MSRP	$100	$35-65%
Performance per Dollar	1.9	5.6+195%
Codename	GP108	Pitcairn
Release	May 17 2017	March 5 2012
Ranking	#641	#460

Search GeForce GT 120 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8210 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.