GeForce GT 620M vs Quadro 410

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 620M vs Quadro 410 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 620M vs Quadro 410: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 620M

2012

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 100W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 410 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quadro 410

2013

Why buy it

✅64.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌122.2% higher power demand at 100W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 410 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 64.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 620M instead at 432 vs 427, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 620M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro 410 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro 410 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 620M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 620M vs Quadro 410 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 620M

The GeForce GT 620M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 432 points.

Quadro 410

The Quadro 410 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 427 points. Launch price was $1,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 620M scores 432 and the Quadro 410 reaches 427 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 620M is built on Kepler while the Quadro 410 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 620M) vs 1,152 (Quadro 410). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 620M) vs 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro 410).

Feature	GeForce GT 620M	Quadro 410
G3D Mark Score	432+1%	427
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	1152+200%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7296 TFLOPS	1.627 TFLOPS+123%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	96+200%
L1 Cache	32 KB	96 KB+200%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 620M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro 410 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 620M	Quadro 410
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 620M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 410 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 620M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 620M and 64-bit on the Quadro 410. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 620M) vs 512 KB (Quadro 410) — the Quadro 410 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 620M	Quadro 410
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 620M draws 45W versus the Quadro 410's 100W — a 75.9% difference. The GeForce GT 620M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 620M) vs 350W (Quadro 410). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GT 620M	Quadro 410
TDP	45W-55%	100W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	9.6+123%	4.3

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro 410 (2013 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GT 620M	Quadro 410
MSRP	—	$149
Codename	GK107	GK104
Release	March 22 2012	July 23 2013
Ranking	#828	#604

Search GeForce GT 620M on Amazon

Search Quadro 410 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.