
GeForce GT 720A vs Radeon R7E

GeForce GT 720A
Popular choices:

Radeon R7E
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GT 720A is positioned at rank #314 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 720A
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 720A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7E.
| Insight | GeForce GT 720A | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 720A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 720A holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $49), it costs 18% less, resulting in a 22.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 720A | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+22.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 720A and Radeon R7E

GeForce GT 720A
The GeForce GT 720A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 628 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 567 points.

Radeon R7E
The Radeon R7E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 20 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 565 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 720A scores 567 and the Radeon R7E reaches 565 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 720A is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7E uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GT 720A) vs 512 (Radeon R7E). Raw compute: 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 720A) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7E).
| Feature | GeForce GT 720A | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 567 | 565 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+50% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.009 TFLOPS+23% | 0.8192 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 128 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 720A | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 720A | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 720A) vs 12_0 (Radeon R7E). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GT 720A | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No NVENC (GeForce GT 720A) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7E). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 720A | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No NVENC | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 720A draws 55W versus the Radeon R7E's 55W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R7E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 720A) vs 350W (Radeon R7E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | GeForce GT 720A | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 10.3 | 10.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 720A launched at $40 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon R7E launched at $0 and now averages $49. The GeForce GT 720A costs 18.4% less ($9 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.2 (GeForce GT 720A) vs 11.5 (Radeon R7E) — the GeForce GT 720A offers 23.5% better value. The GeForce GT 720A is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 720A | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $40 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-18% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.2+23% | 11.5 |
| Codename | GK106 | Cape Verde |
| Release | March 17 2014 | December 20 2013 |
| Ranking | #813 | #738 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











