GeForce GT 730 vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 730

2014Core: 993 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

2023Core: 1855 MHzBoost: 2495 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 730 vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 730 vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 730 vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 730

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $30 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).
  • Delivers 31.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.3 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 64W instead of 295W, a 231W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

2023

Why buy it

  • 122.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 33.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $119 MSRPvs$89 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 9.3 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
  • 360.9% higher power demand at 295W vs 64W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 122.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (837 vs 824), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 96 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 730 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $30 cheaper on MSRP at $89 vs $119, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 31.6% (9.3 vs 7.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GT 730 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 730 vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 730

The GeForce GT 730 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points. Launch price was $89.

AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 837 points. Launch price was $3,999.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 730 scores 824 and the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 reaches 837 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 730 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 730) vs 6,144 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 730) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600).

FeatureGeForce GT 730Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
G3D Mark Score
824
837+2%
Architecture
Kepler
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
384
6144+1500%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7626 TFLOPS
61.32 TFLOPS+7941%
ROPs
16
192+1100%
TMUs
32
384+1100%
L1 Cache
0.03 MB
3 MB+9900%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
6 MB+2300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 730 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 730Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 730 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 730 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 730 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 730) vs 6 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) — the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 730Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
6 MB+2300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 730 draws 64W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600's 295W — a 128.7% difference. The GeForce GT 730 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 730) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GT 730Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
TDP
64W-78%
295W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
145mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
12.9+361%
2.8
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 730 came in at $89, while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 launched at $119. On MSRP, GeForce GT 730 was 25.2% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.3 (GeForce GT 730) vs 7.0 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) — the GeForce GT 730 offers 32.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 (2023 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GT 730Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
MSRP
$89-25%
$119
Performance per Dollar
9.3+33%
7.0
Codename
GK107
Navi 31
Release
May 29 2014
April 13 2023
Ranking
#777
#26

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.