
GeForce GT 730

Radeon R9 M280X
GeForce GT 730 vs Radeon R9 M280X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 730 vs Radeon R9 M280X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 730 vs Radeon R9 M280X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 730
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $161 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 184.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.3 vs 3.3 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 64W instead of 200W, a 136W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M280X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon R9 M280X
2013Why buy it
- ✅106.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌180.9% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$89 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 9.3 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
- ❌212.5% higher power demand at 200W vs 64W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 730 vs Radeon R9 M280X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 730
The GeForce GT 730 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points. Launch price was $89.

Radeon R9 M280X
The Radeon R9 M280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 814 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 730 scores 824 and the Radeon R9 M280X reaches 814 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 730 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 M280X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 730) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M280X). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 730) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M280X).
| Feature | GeForce GT 730 | Radeon R9 M280X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 824+1% | 814 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2048+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7626 TFLOPS | 4.096 TFLOPS+437% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 128+300% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 512 KB+1500% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 730 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M280X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 730 | Radeon R9 M280X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 730 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M280X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M280X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 730 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M280X. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 730) vs 768 KB (Radeon R9 M280X) — the Radeon R9 M280X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 730 | Radeon R9 M280X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 80 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 730 draws 64W versus the Radeon R9 M280X's 200W — a 103% difference. The GeForce GT 730 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 730) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M280X). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GT 730 | Radeon R9 M280X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 64W-68% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 12.9+215% | 4.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 730 came in at $89, while the Radeon R9 M280X launched at $250. On MSRP, GeForce GT 730 was 64.4% cheaper ($161 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.3 (GeForce GT 730) vs 3.3 (Radeon R9 M280X) — the GeForce GT 730 offers 181.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 730 (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 730 | Radeon R9 M280X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $89-64% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.3+182% | 3.3 |
| Codename | GK107 | Tahiti |
| Release | May 29 2014 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #777 | #404 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















