
GeForce GT 730M vs Radeon HD 7670

GeForce GT 730M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7670
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 730M is positioned at rank 203 and the Radeon HD 7670 is on rank 401, so the GeForce GT 730M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 730M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7670
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 730M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7670.
| Insight | GeForce GT 730M | Radeon HD 7670 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7670 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7670 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $45), it costs 44% less, resulting in a 79.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 730M | Radeon HD 7670 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+79.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($45) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 730M and Radeon HD 7670

GeForce GT 730M
The GeForce GT 730M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 807 points.

Radeon HD 7670
The Radeon HD 7670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 803 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 730M scores 807 and the Radeon HD 7670 reaches 803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 730M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 7670 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 730M) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7670). Raw compute: 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 730M) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7670).
| Feature | GeForce GT 730M | Radeon HD 7670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 807 | 803 |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 480+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7427 TFLOPS+29% | 0.576 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 48 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 730M | Radeon HD 7670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 730M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7670 has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 730M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 730M | Radeon HD 7670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 730M draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 7670's 45W — a 10.5% difference. The Radeon HD 7670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 730M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7670). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GT 730M | Radeon HD 7670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 45W-10% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 16.1 | 17.8+11% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7670 costs 44.4% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.9 (GeForce GT 730M) vs 32.1 (Radeon HD 7670) — the Radeon HD 7670 offers 79.3% better value. The GeForce GT 730M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GT 730M | Radeon HD 7670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45 | $25-44% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.9 | 32.1+79% |
| Codename | GK107 | Turks |
| Release | January 9 2013 | January 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #792 | #870 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















