GeForce GT 740 vs GeForce GTX 285

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 740

2014Core: 993 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 285

2008Core: 648 MHz

GeForce GT 740 vs GeForce GTX 285 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 740 vs GeForce GTX 285 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 740 vs GeForce GTX 285: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 740

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $270 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
  • Delivers 290.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.1 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
  • Draws 64W instead of 204W, a 140W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 285 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce GTX 285

2008

Why buy it

  • 87.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 303.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $359 MSRPvs$89 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.1 vs 16.1 G3D/$ ($359 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
  • 218.8% higher power demand at 204W vs 64W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 285 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 87.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.2% in PassMark G3D (1,475 vs 1,429), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 740 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 740 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $270 cheaper on MSRP at $89 vs $359, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 290.8% (16.1 vs 4.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce GTX 285 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 740 vs GeForce GTX 285 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 740

The GeForce GT 740 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,429 points. Launch price was $89.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 285

The GeForce GTX 285 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 23 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 648 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $359.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 740 scores 1,429 and the GeForce GTX 285 reaches 1,475 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 740 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 285 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 740) vs 240 (GeForce GTX 285). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 740) vs 0.7085 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 285).

FeatureGeForce GT 740GeForce GTX 285
G3D Mark Score
1,429
1,475+3%
Architecture
Kepler
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
384+60%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7626 TFLOPS+8%
0.7085 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
80+150%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 740GeForce GTX 285
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 740 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 285.

FeatureGeForce GT 740GeForce GTX 285
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 740) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 285).

FeatureGeForce GT 740GeForce GTX 285
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
Decoder
VP5
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4
H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 740 draws 64W versus the GeForce GTX 285's 204W — a 104.5% difference. The GeForce GT 740 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 740) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 285). Power connectors: None vs 2x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GT 740GeForce GTX 285
TDP
64W-69%
204W
Recommended PSU
300W-45%
550W
Power Connector
None
2x 6-pin
Length
145mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
22.3+210%
7.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 740 came in at $89, while the GeForce GTX 285 launched at $359. On MSRP, GeForce GT 740 was 75.2% cheaper ($270 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.1 (GeForce GT 740) vs 4.1 (GeForce GTX 285) — the GeForce GT 740 offers 292.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 740 (2014 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce GT 740GeForce GTX 285
MSRP
$89-75%
$359
Performance per Dollar
16.1+293%
4.1
Codename
GK107
GT200B
Release
May 29 2014
December 23 2008
Ranking
#777
#771

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.