G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 740 vs Tesla M2090 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 740 vs Tesla M2090: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 740

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,411 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2767.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.1 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 64W instead of 250W, a 186W reduction.
✅Measures 145mm instead of 248mm, a 103mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla M2090

2011

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
2709% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$89 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 16.1 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
❌290.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 64W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GT 740 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (1,429 vs 1,400), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 740 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 740 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,411 cheaper on MSRP at $89 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2767.2% (16.1 vs 0.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GT 740 vs Tesla M2090 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 740

The GeForce GT 740 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,429 points. Launch price was $89.

Tesla M2090

The Tesla M2090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,400 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 740 scores 1,429 and the Tesla M2090 reaches 1,400 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 740 is built on Kepler while the Tesla M2090 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 740) vs 512 (Tesla M2090). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 740) vs 1.332 TFLOPS (Tesla M2090).

Feature	GeForce GT 740	Tesla M2090
G3D Mark Score	1,429+2%	1,400
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7626 TFLOPS	1.332 TFLOPS+75%
ROPs	16	48+200%
TMUs	32	64+100%
L1 Cache	0.03 MB	1 MB+3233%
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 740 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla M2090 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 740	Tesla M2090
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 740 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M2090 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 740 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 740 and 64-bit on the Tesla M2090. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 740) vs 768 KB (Tesla M2090) — the Tesla M2090 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 740	Tesla M2090
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 740) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (Tesla M2090). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GT 740	Tesla M2090
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (FL 11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 740) vs CUDA,OpenCL (Tesla M2090).

Feature	GeForce GT 740	Tesla M2090
Encoder	NVENC 1st Gen	—
Decoder	VP5	—
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4	CUDA,OpenCL

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 740 draws 64W versus the Tesla M2090's 250W — a 118.5% difference. The GeForce GT 740 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 740) vs 350W (Tesla M2090). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 248mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GT 740	Tesla M2090
TDP	64W-74%	250W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	145mm	248mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	22.3+298%	5.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 740 came in at $89, while the Tesla M2090 launched at $2500. On MSRP, GeForce GT 740 was 96.4% cheaper ($2411 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.1 (GeForce GT 740) vs 0.6 (Tesla M2090) — the GeForce GT 740 offers 2583.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 740 (2014 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GT 740	Tesla M2090
MSRP	$89-96%	$2500
Performance per Dollar	16.1+2583%	0.6
Codename	GK107	GF110
Release	May 29 2014	July 25 2011
Ranking	#777	#530

Search GeForce GT 740 on Amazon

Search Tesla M2090 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.