GeForce GT 740A vs Quadro K600

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 740A vs Quadro K600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 740A vs Quadro K600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 740A

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $110 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 119.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.0 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Draws 64W instead of 225W, a 161W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro K600

2013

Why buy it

✅103.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
123.6% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$89 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
❌251.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 64W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K600 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 103.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (722 vs 710), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 740A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2014 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 740A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $110 cheaper on MSRP at $89 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 119.9% (8.0 vs 3.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro K600 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 740A vs Quadro K600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 740A

The GeForce GT 740A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 710 points. Launch price was $89.

Quadro K600

The Quadro K600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 722 points. Launch price was $5,265.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 740A scores 710 and the Quadro K600 reaches 722 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 740A is built on Kepler while the Quadro K600 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 740A) vs 2,880 (Quadro K600). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 740A) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K600).

Feature	GeForce GT 740A	Quadro K600
G3D Mark Score	710	722+2%
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	2880+650%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7626 TFLOPS	5.196 TFLOPS+581%
ROPs	16	48+200%
TMUs	32	240+650%
L1 Cache	32 KB	240 KB+650%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1.5 MB+500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 740A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 740A	Quadro K600
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 740A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K600 carries 1 GB. Quadro K600 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 740A and 64-bit on the Quadro K600. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 740A) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro K600) — the Quadro K600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 740A	Quadro K600
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1.5 MB+500%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 740A draws 64W versus the Quadro K600's 225W — a 111.4% difference. The GeForce GT 740A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 740A) vs 350W (Quadro K600). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GT 740A	Quadro K600
TDP	64W-72%	225W
Recommended PSU	250W-29%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	11.1+247%	3.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 740A came in at $89, while the Quadro K600 launched at $199. On MSRP, GeForce GT 740A was 55.3% cheaper ($110 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.0 (GeForce GT 740A) vs 3.6 (Quadro K600) — the GeForce GT 740A offers 122.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 740A (2014 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GT 740A	Quadro K600
MSRP	$89-55%	$199
Performance per Dollar	8.0+122%	3.6
Codename	GK107	GK110B
Release	May 29 2014	July 23 2013
Ranking	#777	#318

Search GeForce GT 740A on Amazon

Search Quadro K600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.