
GeForce GT 745A

Radeon R9 M270X
GeForce GT 745A vs Radeon R9 M270X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 745A vs Radeon R9 M270X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 745A vs Radeon R9 M270X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 745A
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 158.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.5 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 75W, a 42W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M270X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon R9 M270X
2014Why buy it
- ✅30.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌152.5% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 745A vs Radeon R9 M270X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 745A
The GeForce GT 745A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 26 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 915 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,234 points.

Radeon R9 M270X
The Radeon R9 M270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 21 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,204 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 745A scores 1,234 and the Radeon R9 M270X reaches 1,204 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 745A is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 M270X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 745A) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M270X). Raw compute: 0.7027 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 745A) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M270X). Boost clocks: 915 MHz vs 775 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 745A | Radeon R9 M270X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,234+2% | 1,204 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7027 TFLOPS | 0.992 TFLOPS+41% |
| Boost Clock | 915 MHz+18% | 775 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 160 KB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 745A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M270X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 745A | Radeon R9 M270X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 745A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M270X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M270X gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 745A and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M270X.
| Feature | GeForce GT 745A | Radeon R9 M270X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 745A draws 33W versus the Radeon R9 M270X's 75W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce GT 745A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 745A) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M270X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GT 745A | Radeon R9 M270X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-56% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 37.4+132% | 16.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 745A came in at $99, while the Radeon R9 M270X launched at $250. On MSRP, GeForce GT 745A was 60.4% cheaper ($151 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (GeForce GT 745A) vs 4.8 (Radeon R9 M270X) — the GeForce GT 745A offers 160.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M270X (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 745A | Radeon R9 M270X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-60% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5+160% | 4.8 |
| Codename | GK107 | Venus |
| Release | August 26 2013 | March 21 2014 |
| Ranking | #811 | #819 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















