
GeForce 930MX vs GeForce GT 745A

GeForce 930MX
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 745A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 930MX is positioned at rank 289 and the GeForce GT 745A is on rank 334, so the GeForce 930MX offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 930MX
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 745A
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 930MX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.6% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 745A.
| Insight | GeForce 930MX | GeForce GT 745A |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 745A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 745A holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $25), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 20.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 930MX | GeForce GT 745A |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+20.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 930MX and GeForce GT 745A

GeForce 930MX
The GeForce 930MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 952 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 17W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,278 points.

GeForce GT 745A
The GeForce GT 745A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 26 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 915 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,234 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 930MX scores 1,278 and the GeForce GT 745A reaches 1,234 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 930MX is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GT 745A uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 930MX) vs 384 (GeForce GT 745A). Raw compute: 0.7834 TFLOPS (GeForce 930MX) vs 0.7027 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 745A). Boost clocks: 1020 MHz vs 915 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | GeForce GT 745A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,278+4% | 1,234 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7834 TFLOPS+11% | 0.7027 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1020 MHz+11% | 915 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+500% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | GeForce GT 745A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 930MX comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 745A has 512 MB. The GeForce 930MX offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 930MX) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 745A) — the GeForce 930MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | GeForce GT 745A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 930MX) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 745A). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | GeForce GT 745A |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 930MX) vs NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 745A). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP6) vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 930MX) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 745A).
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | GeForce GT 745A |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC (1st Gen) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP6) | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 930MX draws 17W versus the GeForce GT 745A's 33W — a 64% difference. The GeForce 930MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 930MX) vs 350W (GeForce GT 745A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | GeForce GT 745A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 17W-48% | 33W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 75.2+101% | 37.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 930MX launched at $80 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the GeForce GT 745A launched at $99 and now averages $20. The GeForce GT 745A costs 20% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 51.1 (GeForce 930MX) vs 61.7 (GeForce GT 745A) — the GeForce GT 745A offers 20.7% better value. The GeForce 930MX is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | GeForce GT 745A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80-19% | $99 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | $20-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.1 | 61.7+21% |
| Codename | GM108 | GK107 |
| Release | March 1 2016 | August 26 2013 |
| Ranking | #805 | #811 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












