
GeForce 930MX

GeForce GTX 560M
GeForce 930MX vs GeForce GTX 560M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 930MX vs GeForce GTX 560M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 930MX vs GeForce GTX 560M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 930MX
2016Why buy it
- ✅32.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 75W, a 58W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GeForce GTX 560M
2011Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 930MX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2011 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- ❌341.2% higher power demand at 75W vs 17W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 930MX vs GeForce GTX 560M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 930MX
The GeForce 930MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 952 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 17W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,278 points.

GeForce GTX 560M
The GeForce GTX 560M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 775 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,281 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 930MX scores 1,278 and the GeForce GTX 560M reaches 1,281 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 930MX is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 560M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 930MX) vs 192 (GeForce GTX 560M). Raw compute: 0.7834 TFLOPS (GeForce 930MX) vs 0.5952 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560M).
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | GeForce GTX 560M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,278 | 1,281 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7834 TFLOPS+32% | 0.5952 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 24+200% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 256 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+163% | 0.38 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | GeForce GTX 560M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 930MX has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 560M carries 3 GB. GeForce GTX 560M gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 930MX and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 560M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 930MX) vs 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 560M) — the GeForce 930MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | GeForce GTX 560M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 3 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+163% | 0.38 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 930MX) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 560M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | GeForce GTX 560M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6+15% | 4.0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 930MX) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 560M). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP6) vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 930MX) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 560M).
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | GeForce GTX 560M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP6) | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 930MX draws 17W versus the GeForce GTX 560M's 75W — a 126.1% difference. The GeForce 930MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 930MX) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 560M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | GeForce GTX 560M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 17W-77% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 75.2+340% | 17.1 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce 930MX (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | GeForce GTX 560M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80 | — |
| Codename | GM108 | GF116 |
| Release | March 1 2016 | May 30 2011 |
| Ranking | #805 | #804 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















