GeForce 930MX vs Tesla M2070

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 930MX vs Tesla M2070 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 930MX vs Tesla M2070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 930MX

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,019 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $3,099 MSRP).
✅Delivers 3693.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $3,099 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 17W instead of 225W, a 208W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla M2070

2011

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
3773.7% HIGHER MSRP
$3,099 MSRPvs$80 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 16.0 G3D/$ ($3,099 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
❌1223.5% higher power demand at 225W vs 17W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Tesla M2070 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (1,305 vs 1,278), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 930MX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 930MX makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,019 cheaper on MSRP at $80 vs $3,099, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3693.6% (16.0 vs 0.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Tesla M2070 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 930MX vs Tesla M2070 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 930MX

The GeForce 930MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 952 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 17W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,278 points.

Tesla M2070

The Tesla M2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,305 points. Launch price was $3,099.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 930MX scores 1,278 and the Tesla M2070 reaches 1,305 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 930MX is built on Maxwell while the Tesla M2070 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 930MX) vs 448 (Tesla M2070). Raw compute: 0.7834 TFLOPS (GeForce 930MX) vs 1.03 TFLOPS (Tesla M2070).

Feature	GeForce 930MX	Tesla M2070
G3D Mark Score	1,278	1,305+2%
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	448+17%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7834 TFLOPS	1.03 TFLOPS+31%
ROPs	8	48+500%
TMUs	24	56+133%
L1 Cache	192 KB	896 KB+367%
L2 Cache	1 MB+33%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 930MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla M2070 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 930MX	Tesla M2070
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 930MX has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M2070 carries 512 MB. GeForce 930MX gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 930MX and 64-bit on the Tesla M2070. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 930MX) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla M2070) — the GeForce 930MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 930MX	Tesla M2070
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+33%	0.75 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 930MX draws 17W versus the Tesla M2070's 225W — a 171.9% difference. The GeForce 930MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 930MX) vs 350W (Tesla M2070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce 930MX	Tesla M2070
TDP	17W-92%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	80	—
Perf/Watt	75.2+1197%	5.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 930MX came in at $80, while the Tesla M2070 launched at $3099. On MSRP, GeForce 930MX was 97.4% cheaper ($3019 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.0 (GeForce 930MX) vs 0.4 (Tesla M2070) — the GeForce 930MX offers 3900% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 930MX (2016 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce 930MX	Tesla M2070
MSRP	$80-97%	$3099
Performance per Dollar	16.0+3900%	0.4
Codename	GM108	GF100
Release	March 1 2016	July 25 2011
Ranking	#805	#698

Search GeForce 930MX on Amazon

Search Tesla M2070 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.