
GeForce 930MX

Radeon R7 A370
GeForce 930MX vs Radeon R7 A370 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 930MX vs Radeon R7 A370 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 930MX vs Radeon R7 A370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 930MX
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $69 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 85.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.0 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 100W, a 83W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 A370 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon R7 A370
2015Why buy it
- ✅44.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌86.3% HIGHER MSRP$149 MSRPvs$80 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 16.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- ❌488.2% higher power demand at 100W vs 17W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 930MX vs Radeon R7 A370 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 930MX
The GeForce 930MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 952 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 17W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,278 points.

Radeon R7 A370
The Radeon R7 A370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,281 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 930MX scores 1,278 and the Radeon R7 A370 reaches 1,281 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 930MX is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R7 A370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 930MX) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 A370). Raw compute: 0.7834 TFLOPS (GeForce 930MX) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A370). Boost clocks: 1020 MHz vs 975 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | Radeon R7 A370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,278 | 1,281 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1024+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7834 TFLOPS | 1.997 TFLOPS+155% |
| Boost Clock | 1020 MHz+5% | 975 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 64+167% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 256 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 930MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 A370 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | Radeon R7 A370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 930MX has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A370 carries 512 MB. GeForce 930MX gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 930MX and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A370. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 930MX) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R7 A370) — the GeForce 930MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | Radeon R7 A370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 930MX draws 17W versus the Radeon R7 A370's 100W — a 141.9% difference. The GeForce 930MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 930MX) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | Radeon R7 A370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 17W-83% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 75.2+488% | 12.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 930MX came in at $80, while the Radeon R7 A370 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce 930MX was 46.3% cheaper ($69 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.0 (GeForce 930MX) vs 8.6 (Radeon R7 A370) — the GeForce 930MX offers 86% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 930MX (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | Radeon R7 A370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80-46% | $149 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.0+86% | 8.6 |
| Codename | GM108 | Trinidad |
| Release | March 1 2016 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #805 | #467 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















