
GeForce 930MX vs Radeon R7 A370

GeForce 930MX
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 A370
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 930MX is positioned at rank 289 and the Radeon R7 A370 is on rank 147, so the Radeon R7 A370 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 930MX
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A370
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 A370 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 930MX offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 930MX | Radeon R7 A370 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 930MX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 930MX holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $51), it costs 51% less, resulting in a 103.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 930MX | Radeon R7 A370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+103.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($25) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($51) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 930MX and Radeon R7 A370

GeForce 930MX
The GeForce 930MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 952 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 17W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,278 points.

Radeon R7 A370
The Radeon R7 A370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,281 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 930MX scores 1,278 and the Radeon R7 A370 reaches 1,281 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 930MX is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R7 A370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 930MX) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 A370). Raw compute: 0.7834 TFLOPS (GeForce 930MX) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A370). Boost clocks: 1020 MHz vs 975 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | Radeon R7 A370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,278 | 1,281 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1024+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7834 TFLOPS | 1.997 TFLOPS+155% |
| Boost Clock | 1020 MHz+5% | 975 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 64+167% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 256 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | Radeon R7 A370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 930MX comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A370 has 512 MB. The GeForce 930MX offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 930MX) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R7 A370) — the GeForce 930MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | Radeon R7 A370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 930MX draws 17W versus the Radeon R7 A370's 100W — a 141.9% difference. The GeForce 930MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 930MX) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | Radeon R7 A370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 17W-83% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 75.2+488% | 12.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 930MX launched at $80 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the Radeon R7 A370 launched at $149 and now averages $51. The GeForce 930MX costs 51% less ($26 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 51.1 (GeForce 930MX) vs 25.1 (Radeon R7 A370) — the GeForce 930MX offers 103.6% better value. The GeForce 930MX is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 930MX | Radeon R7 A370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80-46% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-51% | $51 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.1+104% | 25.1 |
| Codename | GM108 | Trinidad |
| Release | March 1 2016 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #805 | #467 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















