
GeForce GT 745M vs RadeonT 610M

GeForce GT 745M
Popular choices:

RadeonT 610M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 745M is positioned at rank 136 and the RadeonT 610M is on rank 232, so the GeForce GT 745M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 745M
Performance Per Dollar RadeonT 610M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RadeonT 610M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The RadeonT 610M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 745M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 745M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RadeonT 610M.
| Insight | GeForce GT 745M | RadeonT 610M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 745M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 745M and RadeonT 610M

GeForce GT 745M
The GeForce GT 745M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,081 points.

RadeonT 610M
The RadeonT 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,068 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 745M scores 1,081 and the RadeonT 610M reaches 1,068 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 745M is built on Kepler while the RadeonT 610M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 745M) vs 128 (RadeonT 610M). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 745M) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (RadeonT 610M).
| Feature | GeForce GT 745M | RadeonT 610M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,081+1% | 1,068 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+200% | 128 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4216 TFLOPS | 0.5632 TFLOPS+34% |
| ROPs | 16+300% | 4 |
| TMUs | 32+300% | 8 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 745M | RadeonT 610M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 745M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT 610M has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 745M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 745M) vs 2 MB (RadeonT 610M) — the RadeonT 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 745M | RadeonT 610M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 745M) vs 12 (12_2) (RadeonT 610M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GT 745M | RadeonT 610M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 (12_2)+9% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6+10% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 3+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GT 745M) vs VCN 3.0 (RadeonT 610M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 (GeForce GT 745M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG (RadeonT 610M).
| Feature | GeForce GT 745M | RadeonT 610M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 745M draws 45W versus the RadeonT 610M's 15W — a 100% difference. The RadeonT 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 745M) vs 350W (RadeonT 610M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GT 745M | RadeonT 610M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W | 15W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 24.0 | 71.2+197% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















