
GeForce GTS 360M
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 555M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTS 360M is positioned at rank 1 and the GeForce GT 555M is on rank 95, so the GeForce GTS 360M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTS 360M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 555M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 555M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTS 360M.
| Insight | GeForce GTS 360M | GeForce GT 555M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 555M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTS 360M and GeForce GT 555M

GeForce GTS 360M
The GeForce GTS 360M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 641 points.

GeForce GT 555M
The GeForce GT 555M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 649 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTS 360M scores 641 and the GeForce GT 555M reaches 649 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 360M is built on Kepler while the GeForce GT 555M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTS 360M) vs 384 (GeForce GT 555M). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 360M) vs 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 555M).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 360M | GeForce GT 555M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 641 | 649+1% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7296 TFLOPS | 0.7526 TFLOPS+3% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTS 360M | GeForce GT 555M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 1 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 360M | GeForce GT 555M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GTS 360M) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 555M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 360M | GeForce GT 555M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0)+8% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 360M) vs None (GeForce GT 555M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD (VP4). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTS 360M) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 555M).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 360M | GeForce GT 555M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | PureVideo HD (VP4) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTS 360M draws 45W versus the GeForce GT 555M's 50W — a 10.5% difference. The GeForce GTS 360M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTS 360M) vs 350W (GeForce GT 555M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 360M | GeForce GT 555M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-10% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 75-17% |
| Perf/Watt | 14.2+9% | 13.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 555M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 360M | GeForce GT 555M |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $35 |
| Codename | GK107 | GK107 |
| Release | March 22 2012 | June 25 2013 |
| Ranking | #828 | #726 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















