GeForce GTS 360M vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 360M

2012Core: Up to 900 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

2025Core: 1660 MHzBoost: 2920 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTS 360M vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTS 360M vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTS 360M vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTS 360M

2012

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 45W instead of 300W, a 255W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $119 MSRP).

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

2025

Why buy it

  • 94.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 566.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 94.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTS 360M instead at 641 vs 629, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2012. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTS 360M vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 360M

The GeForce GTS 360M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 641 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 629 points. Launch price was $1,299.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTS 360M scores 641 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B reaches 629 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 360M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B uses Bristol Ridge, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTS 360M) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 360M) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 2920 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTS 360MRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
G3D Mark Score
641+2%
629
Architecture
Kepler
Bristol Ridge
Process Node
28 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
384
4096+967%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7296 TFLOPS
47.84 TFLOPS+6457%
Boost Clock
950 MHz
2920 MHz+207%
ROPs
16
128+700%
TMUs
32
256+700%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
8 MB+3100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTS 360M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTS 360MRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTS 360M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B carries 512 MB. GeForce GTS 360M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 360M and System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTS 360M) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTS 360MRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
8 MB+3100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTS 360M draws 45W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B's 300W — a 147.8% difference. The GeForce GTS 360M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTS 360M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTS 360MRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
TDP
45W-85%
300W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
14.2+576%
2.1
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B (2025 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTS 360MRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
MSRP
$119
Codename
GK107
Navi 48
Release
March 22 2012
July 23 2025
Ranking
#828
#23

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.