
GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M395
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon R9 M395
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)
2017Radeon R9 M395
2015Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) better than Radeon R9 M395?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 M395 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 29 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 17 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 53 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 6 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 56 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) and Radeon R9 M395

GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)
GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)
The GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1354 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,040 points.

Radeon R9 M395
Radeon R9 M395
The Radeon R9 M395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 834 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,934 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) scores 5,040 and the Radeon R9 M395 reaches 4,934 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 M395 uses GCN, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 M395).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,040+2% | 4,934 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1792+180% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M395 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M395 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M395) — a 57.1% advantage for the Radeon R9 M395. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 176 GB/s+57% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)) vs 12 (FL12_0) (Radeon R9 M395). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (FL12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)) vs UVD (Radeon R9 M395). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs VCE. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 M395).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | UVD |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | VCE |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 M395's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 M395 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 67.2+2% | 65.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Codename | GP107B | — |
| Release | January 3 2017 | June 9 2015 |
| Ranking | #471 | #445 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













