Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro S9000

2012Core: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)

2017Core: 1354 MHzBoost: 1493 MHz
GTX family
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) Performance Spectrum

FirePro S9000
4 GB 225
5,059
+0.4%
brand logoRadeon HD 6970
brand logoRadeon HD8970M
brand logoRadeon RX Vega M GL / 870
brand logoRadeon RX 560 (móvel)
brand logoRadeon R9 390X
brand logoRadeon RX 5600 XT
brand logoRadeon 8060S
brand logoRadeon RX 6800
GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)
4 GB 75
5,040
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 770M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 960M
brand logoGeForce GTX 570
brand logoGeForce MX550
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro S9000

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)

2017

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro S9000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (5,059 vs 5,040), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro S9000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro S9000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro S9000

The FirePro S9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,059 points. Launch price was $2,499.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)

The GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1354 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,040 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S9000 scores 5,059 and the GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) reaches 5,040 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9000) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9000) vs 1.911 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)).

FeatureFirePro S9000GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score
5,059
5,040
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1792+180%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.226 TFLOPS+69%
1.911 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
112+180%
40
L1 Cache
448 KB+87%
240 KB
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro S9000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro S9000GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the FirePro S9000 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel). L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro S9000) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)) — the GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro S9000GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S9000) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro S9000GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)
DirectX
12
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9000) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs NVDEC (3rd Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro S9000) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)).

FeatureFirePro S9000GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)
Encoder
VCE 1.0
NVENC (6th Gen)
Decoder
UVD 3.2
NVDEC (3rd Gen)
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S9000 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)'s 75W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9000) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 80°C.

FeatureFirePro S9000GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)
TDP
225W
75W-67%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
—
Height
111mm
—
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
90°C
80°C-11%
Perf/Watt
22.5
67.2+199%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) (2017 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro S9000GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)
MSRP
$2499
—
Codename
Tahiti
GP107B
Release
August 24 2012
January 3 2017
Ranking
#441
#471
Search FirePro S9000 on AmazonSearch GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel) on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.