FirePro S9000
VS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

FirePro S9000

2012Core: 900 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011Core: 732 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti

Performance Spectrum - GPU

FirePro S9000
225
5,059
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 6970
brand logoRadeon HD8970M
brand logoRadeon RX Vega M GL / 870
brand logoRadeon RX 560 (móvel)
brand logoRadeon R9 390X
brand logoRadeon RX 5600 XT
brand logoRadeon 8060S
brand logoRadeon RX 6800
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
210
5,200
+2.8%
brand logoGeForce MX350
brand logoGeForce GTX 960A
brand logoGeForce GTX 660
brand logoGeForce MX550
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 SLI (móvel)
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro S9000 is positioned at rank #291 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro S9000

#112
GRID RTX6000-1Q
MSRP: $6299|Avg: $1500
99%
#113
Quadro RTX 8000
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9999
99%
#114
Quadro GP100
MSRP: $7000|Avg: $1335
97%
#115
Radeon Instinct MI60
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $600
96%
#276
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
7313%
#291
FirePro S9000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $156
100%
#294
GRID P40-4Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
98%
#295
RTXA5000-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
98%
#296
GRID P6-2Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
97%
#300
GRID K220Q
MSRP: $469|Avg: $40
96%
#301
FirePro W9100
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $200
96%
#302
GRID T4-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1000
94%
#303
FirePro 3D V3700
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
90%
#304
GRID T4-1Q
MSRP: $1880|Avg: $600
87%
#305
GRID M60-2Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
86%
#306
NVS 310
MSRP: $159|Avg: $10
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro S9000.

InsightFirePro S9000GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Performance
❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%)
✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $156), it costs 81% less, resulting in a 434.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro S9000GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Cost Efficiency
❌Lower cost efficiency
✅Better overall value (+434.5%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($156)
✅More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro S9000 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low139 FPS
medium97 FPS
high76 FPS
ultra56 FPS
1440p
low86 FPS
medium60 FPS
high46 FPS
ultra33 FPS
4K
low39 FPS
medium30 FPS
high23 FPS
ultra15 FPS
Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low132 FPS
medium97 FPS
high75 FPS
ultra56 FPS
1440p
low99 FPS
medium73 FPS
high57 FPS
ultra41 FPS
4K
low35 FPS
medium28 FPS
high23 FPS
ultra15 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low228 FPS
medium182 FPS
high130 FPS
ultra77 FPS
1440p
low171 FPS
medium129 FPS
high91 FPS
ultra54 FPS
4K
low90 FPS
medium65 FPS
high48 FPS
ultra30 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low127 FPS
medium94 FPS
high72 FPS
ultra51 FPS
1440p
low77 FPS
medium60 FPS
high39 FPS
ultra26 FPS
4K
low32 FPS
medium24 FPS
high17 FPS
ultra12 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low228 FPS
medium182 FPS
high152 FPS
ultra114 FPS
1440p
low171 FPS
medium137 FPS
high114 FPS
ultra85 FPS
4K
low114 FPS
medium91 FPS
high76 FPS
ultra57 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low234 FPS
medium187 FPS
high156 FPS
ultra117 FPS
1440p
low176 FPS
medium140 FPS
high117 FPS
ultra88 FPS
4K
low84 FPS
medium74 FPS
high68 FPS
ultra44 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low177 FPS
medium144 FPS
high116 FPS
ultra72 FPS
1440p
low102 FPS
medium88 FPS
high67 FPS
ultra41 FPS
4K
low46 FPS
medium37 FPS
high23 FPS
ultra14 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low168 FPS
medium137 FPS
high111 FPS
ultra68 FPS
1440p
low97 FPS
medium84 FPS
high64 FPS
ultra38 FPS
4K
low42 FPS
medium34 FPS
high21 FPS
ultra13 FPS
Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

AMD

FirePro S9000

The FirePro S9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,059 points. Launch price was $2,499.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S9000 scores 5,059 and the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 reaches 5,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9000) vs 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9000) vs 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448).

FeatureFirePro S9000GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
G3D Mark Score
5,059
5,200+3%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1792+300%
448
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.226 TFLOPS+146%
1.312 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
40+25%
TMUs
112+100%
56
L1 Cache
448 KB
896 KB+100%
L2 Cache
768 KB+20%
640 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro S9000GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 320-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro S9000) vs 640 KB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) — the FirePro S9000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro S9000GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit
320-bit+150%
L2 Cache
768 KB+20%
640 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S9000) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro S9000GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
DirectX
12
12 (FL 11_0)
OpenGL
4.6+10%
4.2
Max Displays
6+100%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9000) vs UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs PureVideo VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro S9000) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448).

FeatureFirePro S9000GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Encoder
VCE 1.0
UVD 4.0
Decoder
UVD 3.2
PureVideo VP4
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S9000 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448's 210W — a 6.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9000) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 76°C.

FeatureFirePro S9000GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
TDP
225W
210W-7%
Recommended PSU
350W-36%
550W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 6-pin
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
90°C
76°C-16%
Perf/Watt
22.5
24.8+10%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro S9000 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $156, while the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 launched at $289 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 costs 80.8% less ($126 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 32.4 (FirePro S9000) vs 173.3 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers 434.9% better value. The FirePro S9000 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2011).

FeatureFirePro S9000GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
MSRP
$2499
$289-88%
Avg Price (30d)
$156
$30-81%
Performance per Dollar
32.4
173.3+435%
Codename
Tahiti
GF110
Release
August 24 2012
November 29 2011
Ranking
#441
#571