FirePro S9000
Radeon RX 5300M
FirePro S9000 vs Radeon RX 5300M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro S9000 vs Radeon RX 5300M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro S9000 vs Radeon RX 5300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro S9000
2012Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌164.7% higher power demand at 225W vs 85W.
Radeon RX 5300M
2019Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 225W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro S9000 vs Radeon RX 5300M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro S9000
The FirePro S9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,059 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Radeon RX 5300M
The Radeon RX 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1445 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,044 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S9000 scores 5,059 and the Radeon RX 5300M reaches 5,044 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon RX 5300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9000) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300M). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9000) vs 4.069 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300M).
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Radeon RX 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,059 | 5,044 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+27% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS | 4.069 TFLOPS+26% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+27% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1.5 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 5300M is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The FirePro S9000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Radeon RX 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro S9000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5300M carries 3 GB. FirePro S9000 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the FirePro S9000 and 96-bit on the Radeon RX 5300M. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro S9000) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300M) — the Radeon RX 5300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Radeon RX 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+33% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1.5 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S9000 draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 5300M's 85W — a 90.3% difference. The Radeon RX 5300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9000) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5300M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Radeon RX 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 85W-62% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 22.5 | 59.3+164% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon RX 5300M (2019 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Radeon RX 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | — |
| Codename | Tahiti | Navi 14 |
| Release | August 24 2012 | November 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #441 | #442 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX 5300M
