
Arc Graphics 140V

FirePro S9000
Arc Graphics 140V vs FirePro S9000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc Graphics 140V vs FirePro S9000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Arc Graphics 140V vs FirePro S9000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc Graphics 140V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,149 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 629.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅FirePro S9000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Arc Graphics 140V is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 225W, a 210W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2024 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
FirePro S9000
2012Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌614% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ❌1400% higher power demand at 225W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc Graphics 140V vs FirePro S9000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc Graphics 140V
The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.

FirePro S9000
The FirePro S9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,059 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 140V scores 5,168 and the FirePro S9000 reaches 5,059 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140V is built on Xe² while the FirePro S9000 uses GCN 1.0, both on 3 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 1,792 (FirePro S9000).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,168+2% | 5,059 |
| Architecture | Xe² | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 8 | 1792+22300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 140V has 0 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro S9000 carries 4 GB. FirePro S9000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 140V and 128-bit on the FirePro S9000.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 12 (FirePro S9000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 6+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140V) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9000). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro S9000).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | UVD 3.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 140V draws 15W versus the FirePro S9000's 225W — a 175% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 350W (FirePro S9000). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-93% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C-6% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 344.5+1431% | 22.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc Graphics 140V came in at $350, while the FirePro S9000 launched at $2499. On MSRP, Arc Graphics 140V was 86% cheaper ($2149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 2.0 (FirePro S9000) — the Arc Graphics 140V offers 640% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 140V (2024 vs 2012).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350-86% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.8+640% | 2.0 |
| Codename | Lunar Lake iGPU | Tahiti |
| Release | September 24 2024 | August 24 2012 |
| Ranking | #434 | #441 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















